Hi everyone,
In this unique, new conversation, I talk to professor Toby Green, and professor Reginald Oduor about the impact of lockdown policies on the global South. We also discuss the WHO treaty and its potential impact on the sovereignty of countries in the global South. Prof. Reginald Oduor raises several issues, including the ideology of treating the health of individuals, the environment, and everything equally, the problem of misinformation and disinformation, emergency use authorization of pharmaceutical products, centralization of medical care, and the imposition of a Western approach to disease management. They both argue that the treaty undermines the sovereignty of poorer countries and perpetuates neocolonialism. They criticize the elitism and narrow focus of Western experts and the imposition of Western medicine on the global South. The conversation concludes with a call for a more inclusive and equitable approach to global health.
Takeaways:
Lockdown policies have a devastating impact on the global South, particularly in informal settlements where people rely on daily income.
The WHO treaty is criticized for being a neo-colonial imposition that prioritizes the interests of the West and endangers the sovereignty of countries in the global South. The proposed WHO pandemic treaty raises concerns about the ideology of treating the health of individuals, the environment, and everything equally, which some argue is an ideology rather than medicine.
Misinformation and disinformation are seen as problematic because they are defined as anything that the World Health Organization disagrees with, which can stifle dissenting views and limit the exchange of knowledge.
The emergency use authorization of pharmaceutical products and the centralization of medical care are criticized for potentially protecting pharmaceutical companies and limiting the autonomy of healthcare professionals.
The treaty is seen as a form of neocolonialism that imposes a Western approach to disease management and undermines the sovereignty of poorer countries.
The ethical concerns surrounding vaccine mandates and movement restrictions include the lack of compensation for adverse effects, violations of bodily autonomy and the right to earn a living, and the questionable benefits of vaccines.
Listen Now:
Chapters:
00:00 Introduction and Background
01:02 The Catastrophic Impact of Lockdowns in the Global South
06:33 The Cruelty of Lockdown Policies in India
08:57 The Global South's Experience of Lockdowns
11:36 The Violation of the Implicit Promise of Globalization
21:51 The Impact of Propaganda and Fear of Death
26:13 Opposition to the WHO Treaty and Neo-Colonial Imposition
31:07 Impact on the Sovereignty of the Global South
34:05 Ethical Issues with Vaccine Policies
39:35 Xenophobia and Movement Restrictions
46:23 Imposition of Western Medicine and Knowledge
51:05 Critique of Neoliberalism and Colonialism
51:58 Maintaining Integrity in the Face of Pandemic
53:23 Closing Remarks
Sound Bites:
"If you haven't got reliable electricity, you can't have a fridge necessarily. So you're going to need to go out every day to get food."
"The lockdowns themselves were a violation of this implicit promise. It was essentially a way to destroy the lives of the poor, every single poor person on the earth."
"The health of the individual and the health of the environment and the health of everything must be treated together on an equal footing. That is an ideology rather than medicine and I have a problem with that."
"Misinformation and disinformation turns out to be anything that the World Health Organization disagrees with."
"Emergency use authorization of pharmaceutical products will protect the pharmaceuticals by law as they push poorly tested products and devices."
Our sponsor Alcami Elements:
Our new blend uses high-quality, organic Peruvian cacao, enhancing the delicious flavour of our original mix. True raw cacao is high in antioxidants and minerals such as magnesium which also can have calming effects.
Illusion of Consensus readers can get 10% off their first order or 30% off a monthly subscription using the code "illusionconsensus” here:
https://www.alcamielements.com/products/alcami-elements-life-enhancing-beverage
What did the WHO do under Covid, partnering with health departments and governments around the world who justified their restrictions as medically necessary? They created varying degrees of police states with enforcement of onerous and often cruel mandates.
Klaus Schwab said we’d never go back to normal; that was his hope for a great reset police state. That, we saw with our own eyes, was the real endgame. Schwab, Gates, Macron, Trudeau, and more: they all wanted police states, anathema to ideals of individual self-determination and freedom. They wanted unreasoned media fear porn, they encouraged it and baited it, the better to create the desired police state.
And now the global tyrants want to do it all over again? And they’re being helped?
Of course they don’t want anyone speaking misinformation against them: that’s the very nature of a police state.
They killed millions and now want more power....
My awareness and knowledge has been widened. Thank you.
Great interview, thank you. I first came across the idea that a Western, globally enforced public health apparatus is neo-colonial in this obscure article from April 2022:
https://onlyagame.typepad.com/only_a_game/2022/04/decolonising-public-health.html
It's a great read (the author, a game designer with a philosophical bent, is now on substack https://strangerworlds.substack.com/about)
After I became aware of the latest WHO reforms, it all seemed so obvious, and the work of David Bell and others of his ilk only confirmed it. What I liked so much about your interview was hearing voices with robust 'on the ground' and historical knowledge. Thanks again.
I find it hard to understand that many countries are to sign up to give Power to the
W.H.O. then how the hell did they have this power to do what they did, am I missing
something.?????
Excellent. Climate industry demands of these same countries is also neo colonialism. Great Substack by a rural Kenyan trying to get reliable electricity for his village: https://juspermachogu.substack.com/p/cherry-tomatoes
I think the difference here is that climate science is an actual consensus. Interesting though is that your Substack link references Alex Epstein who is a proponent of fossil fuels who makes an interesting argument. He recognizes that the world is warming and that humans are causing the warming, he just doesn't think it will be a big deal.
https://alexepstein.substack.com/p/what-should-government-do-to-address
There are quite a few scientists who share Epsteins view and are willing now to confront the climate orthodoxy.
I have yet to hear from a convincing climate science dissident. In fact I find a large number of them have ties to extraction industries (including anyone with a geology degree, as they almost exclusively work in extraction), much like many scientists in healthcare are compromised in one way or another by pharmaceutical or big government interests who fund their research. But I am always interested to hear new viewpoints so throw some names and papers my way if you feel so inclined.
Here are a few you might look to: Richard Lindzen, Steven Koonin, Bjorn Lomborg - all appropriately credentialed. None claims global warming is not happening but that it is not a crisis.
Thanks. Listening now to one of my favorite podcasters Lex Fridman episode #339 – Climate Change Debate: Bjørn Lomborg and Andrew Revkin.
And our Crypt Keeper Resident in DC will trip over himself to sign us up 😡
I can't find the website for the PanAfrican Epidemic and Pandemk Working Group. Would someone send me a link to it? Thanks.
conniedtate@gmail.com