Did they investigate the death of NYTimes editor Carlos Tejada? He died suddenly in South Korea right after getting a booster. Berenson reported on it in late 2021.
However they undersell the fatality rate. Myocarditis can be provably shown to cause 8.1% fatality rate *within the first year* (as opposed to the S. Korean's 4.4% finding over multiple years).
This might have something to do with Pfizer's desperate wild flailing to get as many AEDs installed in as many locations as possible (including children's schools and sports clubs) simply so they can offset the high death rates by replacing them with permanent, lifelong disabilities instead.
I attended the 2023 commencement at Georgetown Law School (GLS). GLS decided against in-person classes in the fall of 2020. Dean Treanor treated the graduating class to heroic hyperbole for the difficulties of remote learning in their 1L year. Not once did he acknowledge that the harms he listed were entirely the fault of GLS.
Once in-person classes started, all students needed to be fully vaccinated, boosted and masked. Of course it could be no other way with Doug Emhoff (Kamala's husband) on the GLS staff.
So, what is the current science on the statements made by Rogan's guest asserting that young people are 8 times more likely to experience myocarditis from the virus than the vaccine? Is that assertion even remotely true, or has it been proven false? If false, what's more dangerous (specific to myocarditis) to young people, the vax or the virus?
What is definitely true, is that they still get the disease even if they had the vax. In fact, the Cleveland study shows they are more likely to get the disease, the more vaxxed they are.
Does the US CDC (or any other agency) offer an official number of US covid vaccine deaths that they acknowledge? I don't care how contrived the number might be, I am curious whether it exists? If the number does not exist, is the official stance that nobody in the US has died, or that the number doesn't matter?
This is not a direct answer to your question, but the CDC mortality data (which they finally "updated" <6 months ago to correct a substantial undercount) does reveal that all-cause mortality INCREASED by 5% (corresponding to ~150,000 more deaths) in 2021 compared to 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db456.pdf. This lines up very closely with the gold-standard randomized clinical trials showing slightly increased all-cause mortality with mRNA vaccines compared to placebo, even at the height of the pandemic.
Inject an admitted novel, experimental product into the majority of the population and have no plan to gather follow up data to determine safety of said experimental product. Seems kind of strange does it?
Gold-standard randomized clinical trial mortality data (i.e. the only UNBIASED mortality data) clearly shows that mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) have an infinitely WORSE impact on overall mortality than adenovirus vector vaccines (Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca). mRNA vaccines are much, much MORE likely to cause excess non-COVID deaths, and also LESS effective against COVID deaths. EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE of what the medical establishment told us.
mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna):
COVID deaths: 2 vaccine vs. 5 placebo - similar denominators of ~37000 each
non-COVID deaths: 29 vaccine vs. 25 placebo - similar denominators of ~37000 each
Overall: slightly INCREASED all-cause mortality, even at the height of the pandemic
Adenovirus vector vaccines (AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Sputnik):
COVID deaths: 2/72138 vaccine vs. 8/50026 placebo
non-COVID deaths: 14/72138 vaccine vs. 22/50026 placebo
The War On The Child: Battlefront Child Experiments and Parental Informed Consent.
Comment: A risk ratio for dying from myocarditis vs dying from covid19, and another RR for severe myo vs severe c19, would imho help to succinctly communicate the tradeoff that parents need to know. Of course not the “with covid” rather the “from covid”. Another set of RRs for cardiac related outcomes vs c19 outcomes would also be of interest.
"This data makes it very difficult to understand the rationale for vaccinating"...The rationale is profit. The "safe & effective" mantra is PR. I wish everyone would frankly acknowledge that Pharma & other monopolies exist for profit above all. This is not a conspiracy theory, it's how businesses work. Unless they are reined in somehow, they will cause all kinds of collateral damage in their machinations to produce profit and grow infinitely.
Let's think about car accidents for a moment. It's an important parallel..
Most car accidents are trivial - don't enrm cause damage that needs to be repaired. A small percentage of car accidents are more serious causing us to live with h the damage, but usually nothing more. A very few car accidents result in serious damage to the car, but no damage at all to driver or passengers. Many of these are never reported. A much smaller number result in person injuries. Some of there are also not reported officially. Of those that are reported, we study from many angles, the car, the driver, the road, the traffic, the conditions... and more. A very, very small number of car accidents cause permanent injury or death. We intentionally examine each and every one of those - often in excruciatingly severe investigations.
Vaccine injuries are a parallel in freeuency and severity. But we're still in a stage of denial, even in the face of many injuries and deaths. There is no interest in studying individual cases to understand causes...
Covid-19 is a mortality hoax and so the vaccines are an effectiveness hoax, both easy to prove and already proven by the following mathematocal method:
Unfortunately medicals have difficulties even with understandind the ready proof and so often ignore it , while are not able to point any mistake
...The method will not be given to a journal (including medical ones)
For the proof it is enough to know: -the age-structure of "official deaths due to Covid-19" in 2020; -the average otherwise expected age of death of not-Covid-19 victims in 2020 (plus their age-structure); -age-structure of deaths due to causes other that "aging/conditions" (mainly injuries and infant mortality); -Life Table (for both at-birth life expectancy and further life expectancy); -death rates for age-subroups in the U.S.; -the average number of chronic condition in the Covid-19 group vs. the normal one; -the correlation between the number of conditions and further life expectancy; -Covid-19 age-subgroups' illness rates, and ACE2 receptor expression levels at different age-subgroups.
Wow. Imagine having to get a *heart transplant* because you got a “vaccine” that did nothing to protect you from a disease that wasn’t gonna hurt you.
Meanwhile, do you know that Harvard is *still* requiring all undergrads to get the shot?
I’m still in disbelief that the pediatric shot was approved at all based on *nothing*! It is all so, so corrupt:
https://gaty.substack.com/p/immunobridge-in-brooklyn-for-sale
Did they investigate the death of NYTimes editor Carlos Tejada? He died suddenly in South Korea right after getting a booster. Berenson reported on it in late 2021.
It's nice to know those South Koreans found numbers verifying what The Daily Beagle came up with (see: https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/proving-the-mrna-shots-harm-children), where we calculated a 1 in every 20,000 to a 1 in every 100,000 myocarditis incidence rate.
However they undersell the fatality rate. Myocarditis can be provably shown to cause 8.1% fatality rate *within the first year* (as opposed to the S. Korean's 4.4% finding over multiple years).
This might have something to do with Pfizer's desperate wild flailing to get as many AEDs installed in as many locations as possible (including children's schools and sports clubs) simply so they can offset the high death rates by replacing them with permanent, lifelong disabilities instead.
Albert Bourla needs to hang.
Too good for him. Rope, stake and faggots. Match.
I attended the 2023 commencement at Georgetown Law School (GLS). GLS decided against in-person classes in the fall of 2020. Dean Treanor treated the graduating class to heroic hyperbole for the difficulties of remote learning in their 1L year. Not once did he acknowledge that the harms he listed were entirely the fault of GLS.
Once in-person classes started, all students needed to be fully vaccinated, boosted and masked. Of course it could be no other way with Doug Emhoff (Kamala's husband) on the GLS staff.
Dean Treanor's speech was a PSYOP.
given CDC thinks 95% of all US citizens have covid antibodies, why do some college mandates still exist?
same question for health systems requiring the covid shot for surgeries? do they require flu shots, even if not in flu season?
So, what is the current science on the statements made by Rogan's guest asserting that young people are 8 times more likely to experience myocarditis from the virus than the vaccine? Is that assertion even remotely true, or has it been proven false? If false, what's more dangerous (specific to myocarditis) to young people, the vax or the virus?
What is definitely true, is that they still get the disease even if they had the vax. In fact, the Cleveland study shows they are more likely to get the disease, the more vaxxed they are.
Does the US CDC (or any other agency) offer an official number of US covid vaccine deaths that they acknowledge? I don't care how contrived the number might be, I am curious whether it exists? If the number does not exist, is the official stance that nobody in the US has died, or that the number doesn't matter?
This is not a direct answer to your question, but the CDC mortality data (which they finally "updated" <6 months ago to correct a substantial undercount) does reveal that all-cause mortality INCREASED by 5% (corresponding to ~150,000 more deaths) in 2021 compared to 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db456.pdf. This lines up very closely with the gold-standard randomized clinical trials showing slightly increased all-cause mortality with mRNA vaccines compared to placebo, even at the height of the pandemic.
Inject an admitted novel, experimental product into the majority of the population and have no plan to gather follow up data to determine safety of said experimental product. Seems kind of strange does it?
Sadly, yes, Team Blue has been Team Blind when it comes to these “vaccines.”
Gold-standard randomized clinical trial mortality data (i.e. the only UNBIASED mortality data) clearly shows that mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) have an infinitely WORSE impact on overall mortality than adenovirus vector vaccines (Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca). mRNA vaccines are much, much MORE likely to cause excess non-COVID deaths, and also LESS effective against COVID deaths. EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE of what the medical establishment told us.
mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna):
COVID deaths: 2 vaccine vs. 5 placebo - similar denominators of ~37000 each
non-COVID deaths: 29 vaccine vs. 25 placebo - similar denominators of ~37000 each
Overall: slightly INCREASED all-cause mortality, even at the height of the pandemic
Adenovirus vector vaccines (AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Sputnik):
COVID deaths: 2/72138 vaccine vs. 8/50026 placebo
non-COVID deaths: 14/72138 vaccine vs. 22/50026 placebo
Overall: decreased all-cause mortality
https://www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext/S2589-0042(23)00810-6?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS2589004223008106%3Fshowall%3Dtrue
Layman's summary here: https://dailysceptic.org/2022/04/09/covid-vaccines-increase-risk-of-heart-related-deaths-by-up-to-50-lancet-analysis-of-trial-data-finds/ (their facts are correct, though some may not care for their slightly sensationalist writing style)
The War On The Child: Battlefront Child Experiments and Parental Informed Consent.
Comment: A risk ratio for dying from myocarditis vs dying from covid19, and another RR for severe myo vs severe c19, would imho help to succinctly communicate the tradeoff that parents need to know. Of course not the “with covid” rather the “from covid”. Another set of RRs for cardiac related outcomes vs c19 outcomes would also be of interest.
END THESE MURDEROUS EVILS BY UNITING WITH GOD AND LIKE MINDED BROTHERS AND SISTERS FOR OUR FUTURE HEALTH AND FREEDOM
"This data makes it very difficult to understand the rationale for vaccinating"...The rationale is profit. The "safe & effective" mantra is PR. I wish everyone would frankly acknowledge that Pharma & other monopolies exist for profit above all. This is not a conspiracy theory, it's how businesses work. Unless they are reined in somehow, they will cause all kinds of collateral damage in their machinations to produce profit and grow infinitely.
Let's think about car accidents for a moment. It's an important parallel..
Most car accidents are trivial - don't enrm cause damage that needs to be repaired. A small percentage of car accidents are more serious causing us to live with h the damage, but usually nothing more. A very few car accidents result in serious damage to the car, but no damage at all to driver or passengers. Many of these are never reported. A much smaller number result in person injuries. Some of there are also not reported officially. Of those that are reported, we study from many angles, the car, the driver, the road, the traffic, the conditions... and more. A very, very small number of car accidents cause permanent injury or death. We intentionally examine each and every one of those - often in excruciatingly severe investigations.
Vaccine injuries are a parallel in freeuency and severity. But we're still in a stage of denial, even in the face of many injuries and deaths. There is no interest in studying individual cases to understand causes...
I think there is an error in your essay, Rav. "21 deaths, all in those aged 45 or less, were ultimately attributed to the vaccine."
The 21 deaths ranged from ages 22-95. All 8 of the sudden cardiac death were <46.
https://twitter.com/TracyBethHoeg/status/1665507913115512833
I could be wrong. Keep up the good work!
SUE THEM EVILS UNTILL THEY HAVE NOTHING AND THEY WILL EAT BUGS AND BE HAPPY --- AND https://banned.video/watch?id=64823162492826dd9d237548
Hi
Covid-19 is a mortality hoax and so the vaccines are an effectiveness hoax, both easy to prove and already proven by the following mathematocal method:
https://zenodo.org/record/7372672
Unfortunately medicals have difficulties even with understandind the ready proof and so often ignore it , while are not able to point any mistake
...The method will not be given to a journal (including medical ones)
For the proof it is enough to know: -the age-structure of "official deaths due to Covid-19" in 2020; -the average otherwise expected age of death of not-Covid-19 victims in 2020 (plus their age-structure); -age-structure of deaths due to causes other that "aging/conditions" (mainly injuries and infant mortality); -Life Table (for both at-birth life expectancy and further life expectancy); -death rates for age-subroups in the U.S.; -the average number of chronic condition in the Covid-19 group vs. the normal one; -the correlation between the number of conditions and further life expectancy; -Covid-19 age-subgroups' illness rates, and ACE2 receptor expression levels at different age-subgroups.