May 4, 2023·edited May 4, 2023Liked by Rav Arora

Next, I hope you will take on "gender affirming care", which mutilates hundreds and sterilizes thousands of otherwise healthy children every year in the US.

Expand full comment

We will most certainly cover that. Stay tuned.

Expand full comment

Did you know that a "consensus" of scientists says that binary genders are a false construct? A consensus of pseudoscientists says so.

Have you ever heard of "biopsychology?" I hadn't before a few months ago, either. But here is a description of it:


It's a form of social science, not natural medical science. Biopsychology "science" offers this rationale for changing public policy to conform to gender identity...it is "science" you know, "the best science" we must follow, The Science (TM):


As with all of the social science based-public policy agenda, practitioners use a tiny bit of actual medical, natural science to build on and expand an entire narrative to fit the desired public policy goal of leaders and a powerful elite.

Like this study that says that the zygote stage of an embryo is often ambiguous in determining gender. And since the science of genetics as presented in a study like this is plausibly non-determinative it is up to any individual to identify as a gender of their own choosing that they feel most comfortable as:


Social science. Masquerading as Natural science. All-one. If you trust the "consensus" of The Science (TM).

The Science (TM) that is the product of The Science Wars?


Did you know that Marx and Engels had thoughts on Science?:


"We know only a single science, the science of history. One can look at history from two sides and divide it into the history of nature and the history of men. The two sides are, however, inseparable; the history of nature and the history of men are dependent on each other so long as men exist."

A single science. No division. All one. Pandemic protocols have been the product of psychologists performing open heart surgery while cardiologists watch from observation deck above. Same difference. The Science (TM)!!

Expand full comment

Splendid analogy! The truth sucks!

Expand full comment

A very detailed explanation of an imagined reality

Expand full comment

I saw an article about how people are trying to be other races and how that can't possibly be true. Ha it was funny because it was NBC news. To them it is possible to change genders but not races. Then they back it up with what scientists say about how its not possible and yadda yadda yadda. They are not spiritually fit, to say the least, because if you believe in one it only makes sense to believe the other. Clearly they are full of nonsense... about transgenders. They are actually right about the races, but for some reason the link isn't made. Madness

Expand full comment

Hoping you will take on the gravest issues facing humanity now.


We the People must always be aware of the existential threats lurking behind this fight!

All manner of lies and propaganda spew forth from the upper echelons in governments worldwide who are completely intertwined with the global criminal ruling class that wants to commit the worst atrocities imaginable and suffer no consequences. And their corruption slithers down the chain of command creating petty tyrants everywhere.

Supporting this excellent post with a statement and useful links. RejectDigitalEnslavement.com

It was NEVER about health! The Powers That Should Not Be were ALWAYS about they want you DEAD or a SLAVE! This is a painful truth to accept but we the people must wake up and fight back!

We must never lose sight of the larger picture of the vile malignance we are fighting against.


There is an insidious global ruling class plot to enslave all life on earth behind all the madness and suffering inflicted on We the People.

How to fight back against this TOTAL SLAVERY!


Other than getting rid of nuclear weapons which I support 100% the rest of the anti-nuclear peace movement and CLIMATE CRISIS propaganda is parroting UN utter GARBAGE, a complete surrender to the ENSLAVEMENT AGENDA by the diabolical despots of Davos - ruling class criminals who lust for total power and control and all of whom should be tried and jailed for life and their malign organizations dismantled: the UN, the WEF, the IMF, the WHO, the BIS, NATO, Blackrock, Vanguard, The Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, The Bilderbergers, the CFR et al.

There is an evil predator globalist technocratic elite agenda of eugenics/depopulation/genocide using bioweapon poison jabs, war, geoengineering, EMF radiation, starvation and economic collapse - THE GREAT RESET/AGENDA 2030/4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION to get rid of billions of 'useless eaters' and to use nano tech to turn the survivors into ROBOTIZED COMPLIANT SLAVES! WAKE UP AND RESIST! DO NOT COMPLY! These are psychopath megalomaniacs who want to play god by turning all life into digitized metaverse mechanistic synthetic biology to be manipulated by their AI algorithms. A more demonic sickening idea is nearly impossible to imagine!


MAKE THE WORLD AND AMERICA 2019 (comparatively speaking), AND FREE AGAIN!

















Pam Popper: https://makeamericansfreeagain.com

Del Bigtree: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/highwire


Naomi Wolf: https://dailyclout.io



Expand full comment

Why do you persist in implying that elderly benefit from Covid vaccination? Why would that be true, when every other demographic has injury. Can you please explain in more detail? Thank you

Expand full comment

Just to remind you that the Cochrane Reports study on the benefits of the influenza vaccine found that there is only negligible protection for those over 60; however, this population is great for falling for that snake oil cure.

Expand full comment

Do not include me in the over 60s who get every vaccine offered by their physician. I took one flu shot when I was 21 and became ill from it. Im way past 60 now.

Expand full comment

In a way, thank God you got ill from that very first so that you were able to ascertain at a very young age not to take anymore. I’ve never taken one, but my poor mother-in-law took one every year. She worked for Shell Oil,, and they always pushed it. She developed Alzheimer’s and cancer after retiring. No one else in the family had ever had these diseases, and I feel like it goes back to these flu shots.

Expand full comment

You may have a good theory! I blamed flu shots, statins and diet drinks for my father in laws dementia…

Expand full comment

You are spot on about those unnecessary and dangerous statins. And yes, those artificial sweeteners I believe cause lots of problems, including cancer. I hope your family listens to you.

Expand full comment

I think there is a link between artificial sweeteners and pancreatic cancer. Just an observation from living a long time in one area.

Expand full comment
May 24, 2023·edited May 24, 2023

Shelly, research indicates (available at NIH and PubMed) that PPIs - Proton Pump Inhibitors for acid reflux such as omeprazole (Prilosec), lansoprazole (Prevacid), Pantoprazole (Protonix), and quite a few others, all ending in "prazole", and can indeed cause - or worsen - dementia. PPIs are very popular, prescribed by most physicians, and are fairly effective for the most part, but NOT worth the significant risk of early dementia, especially in those of us who have taken them for years. The companies making these drugs claim the risk is small, if taken properly - meaning for a short period of time only, which leaves out those of us with GERD (Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disorder).

A lot of doctors make light of this adverse effect, but as a man now in my seventies who took five or six (the VA changed them based on what was currently cheapest) different ones for over fifteen years - and is developing a form of aphasia (loss of ability to speak or understand language, in my case, anomic aphasia - inability to remember names of objects, concepts, people, etc.) I firmly believe the long-term use has damaged the (not bragging) extremely large vocabulary to which I once had access. Fortunately, writing allows me to come up with the words I need or can substitute, but conversations can be difficult.

If you need relief from acid reflux/GERD, H2 blockers - such as Prevacid/famotidine - are much safer, and they work well for me. BE ADVISED THOUGH: if you stop taking PPIs after extended use, you can end up with "hyper-secretory syndrome" where more stomach acid than normal is then produced, so your doctor will need to prescribe a higher dose or you will need more over-the-counter famotidine. I require three doses daily of 40 mg each to control my reflux. (I am a retired RN, and this information is accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and personal research.)

Expand full comment

I had GERD for years, and took omeprazole. When I stopped eating carbohydrates, the GERD stopped. I lost 113 pounds. I am now 71 years old, and sharp as a tack.

Expand full comment

Statins are a major cause of dementia. They fail to say that the human brain thrives on cholesterol. Are you aware that they are seriously considering adding statins to the water supply?

Expand full comment

Yeah I took the flu shot two years in a row and now have MS. Never again and I warn everyone I can.

Expand full comment

I hope the new podcast presents all the evidence that the flu shots were the world's greatest scam ... before the Covid shots took over that title. I also wonder if the flu shots might have contributed to the spike in deaths in November-December 2020.

Expand full comment

RFK, Jr. seems to agree with me that the flu vaccines probably contributed significantly to Covid "cases" and deaths in the fall /winter of 2020/2021 - before most people had gotten a Covid vaccine. This needs to be studied ... but never will be.


Expand full comment

It takes something like 70K people to get vaccinated to reduce one influenza infection. #notanks

Expand full comment

don't include me, either... But you're right that many in my generation believe in vaccines. I think it's due to the success of small pox and polio (and I've just discovered that polio came about almost in a very similar manner to the covid shot!) Sadly, most are clueless about the numerous shots that children are now subjected to even before they can leave the hospital. Babies have a strong immunity from mom at that time & don't need shots especially the Hepatitis shot that is now forced on them to be able to take the baby home. Then it's dozens of shots before they can go to school which I believe causes a ton of problems in children - autism, behavioral issues. One of my grandchildren completely changed from a bubbly, curious, active toddler to completely withdrawn after her shots at 18 months. Now at four, she's just there, quietly playing with her toys, but not talking, no longer walking much, & they're unable to get her completely potty trained as she is off in another world.

Expand full comment

It isn't true and never was true.

Expand full comment

And never will be true, ever.

Expand full comment

Can't be said enough. I have repeated that time and time again to my friends and family - the PCR test is wrong, so the whole damn thing doesn't exist. What exists is people that are sick, due to poor lifestyle choices.

Expand full comment

That's certainly what I see. Incredibly poor and destructive lifestyle choices.

Expand full comment

The utter LIE that vaccination reduces the risk of hospitalization and death is just that....A LIE! You can't prove that!

Expand full comment

100%. What we do know is that later in the pandemic, despite the lying government and its media drones, most everyone hospitalized , and most of the dead had taken the mrna jabs.

Expand full comment

Yep! It's actually exactly the opposite - it increases the risk.

Expand full comment

All vaccines are in these days dangerous, they were also decades before, but now, iin these days the manufacturers are inserting all type of vials with several products, not listed in their product line, graphene, and others which are dangerous to our health... so don't get any,,

Expand full comment

Having grown up in South America and Africa in the 60’s & 70’s everyone I knew was subjected to multiple vaccinations that most Americans never experience. Isn’t it remarkable that over all those years and amongst all those people I knew (and still know many) there were zero adverse effects. It’s clear to me that after the early 70’s “vaccines” ingredients were “improved” much to their detriment. The “vaccines” of today resemble nothing like they used to and are now suspect as an entire class.

Expand full comment

you said a truth, those first ones were searching to bring a better life to people, and after they saw the big money that could bring them through forced vaccinetion programs specially in South America and Africa, as you mention, they change their vision to make and probe several in people and stop making proofs and authorization..

Expand full comment

Thanks for sharing JudyC - yes now most of them are laced with heavy metals and aluminum, which makes us a conduit for EMF and mind control:


Expand full comment

the mrna vaccines did absolutely nothing except kill and maim perfectly healthy people.

Expand full comment

Including old people

Expand full comment

That was the point, wasn't it? A blood sacrifice to quench the thirst of dark entitiies and politicians.

Expand full comment

Whilst scaring the younger into submission because grandma& grandpa’s lives depend directly on what they do instead of how doctors choose to treat their illnesses.

Expand full comment

Yes - the good ole guilt trip. Works like a charm for those of us with weak /undefined personal boundaries, no?

Expand full comment

I don't think the nursing home patients were allowed to decline...

Expand full comment

especially old people

Expand full comment

I'd also add that this is not vaccination but transfection. It's mechanism of action is wholly different. Unless their definition of vaccine is 'may elicit antibodies'. We all know that systemic antibodies are of no use in a respiratory infection unless the infection progresses to viremia. Given the mutational nature of coronaviruses, antigen specific humoral antibodies are essentially a bad choice. The vulnerable would have been better off with early treatment and zero transfections.

Expand full comment

Shelly, the deathvax helps no one. It maims and kills

Expand full comment

Now that's a good slogan for a tshirt!

Expand full comment

Yes. That's my question as well especially since this group was underrepresented in the trials.

Expand full comment

Suggesting that the elderly are more vulnerable is an abdication of the responsibility to study cause. AGE is a reality, not a cause. Many people who are elderly have accumulated more CAUSES of illness, even as they are below the threshold of diagnosis. As a result, when those people get an illness like COVID or influenza, even the common cold - they are at more risk of serious consequences. If we study and address those causes on an individual basis, our actions will be much more effective than some MASS campaign to medicate the elderly without individual identification of cause.

to your health, tracy

Author: A New Theory of Cure

Expand full comment

I understand the basis of the remark, along the lines that, given the alleged illness “covid19 is a diminutive threat to the young yet a substantial risk for the elderly. So risk/benefit does not support vaccinating the young but potentially there might be much greater benefit in the elderly”.

Unfortunately there are at least two problems with this:

1. The epidemiological evidence shows that there never was a pandemic, in the USA at least (Rancourt, D et al 2020, 2021, 2022).

2. Even if the government narrative was correct, the serious adverse effect rate, quoted here at 1:800, though others offer evidence of closer to 1% in the frail elderly (recall Norway backing away from indiscriminate mass surveillance injections in 2021, after a substantial spate of deaths rapidly after care home injections?).

3. Those who aren’t aware need to get up to speed and stop pretending. These injections were designed to injure, maim and kill. They contain several, undisguised toxic principals, most obviously the very design. Causing a human body to express a foreign, therefore non-self protein, will cause autoimmune attacks on all transfected cells. The lipid nanoparticles were known a decade ago to concentrate in the ovaries, and there’s no animal reproductive toxicology.

Expand full comment
May 5, 2023·edited May 5, 2023

They killed the elderly en-masse with the denial of standard care for the flu and blamed COVID19 and then they murdered almost a sixth of the elderly with injections and again blamed COVID19 then those that survived they said weren't being badly affected by the clot shots. They effectively used the Pfizer protocols of determining harm by simply removing anyone that died of the clot shots from that column and assigned them instead to the COVID19 column. A similar method was used to show the "scientific consensus" for manmade climate change where they simply removed all the papers that said the opposite or that refused to say it was manmade change and then counted up all the papers that sort of maybe slghtly sort of said that man may be sort of maybe possibly involved in it and then said they definitely said it was all manmade and our fault and we should all be culled. It is easy to come to a consensus conclusion when you use the Pfizer or climate hysterics methodology. If only I could convince my bank manager that £1 was actually £10,000 so easily as that and be permitted to get away with it just as the mainstream media have allowed the proponents the clot shot fraud and the climate change scam to get away with it.

Expand full comment


Reading Substack by A Midwestern Doctor on the protracted and hugely injurious fraud that was the arc of history of SSRIs, we’re reminded that they’ve done this before. More than once. Unfortunately.

Expand full comment

Damn! Great comment John!!!

Expand full comment

Even for those who believe the official "virus exists" narrative, Cuomo was even told by the political leaders in Italy and Europe expressly not to put the elderly in contact with other covid patients and did it anyway. Sounds like we need to work on our Jedi mind tricks especially when it comes to bank managers.

Expand full comment

It also wouldn’t make sense that the jab is bad for the young & healthy w/ robust immune systems, hearts, lungs, etc but somehow beneficial to the elderly w/ waning & worn out immune systems, organs & other physical health issues that compromise health as we age. I will never believe other than these were deliberately design to kill off the elderly & debilitate & render sterile the younger cohort. Not 1 person, anywhere, benefitted from the poisons

Expand full comment

Thank you Mike for your excellent comments.

Expand full comment

Your last paragraph is so crucial. Lumping covid transfections into the vaccine definition is egregious and in all likelihood, malevolent.

Expand full comment

I hope you will be able to go beyond the Covid Pandemic, though I agree there is a lot of material there... The "overwhelming benefits of gender-affirming care" is another fake consensus. So is the one around the "man-made global warming crisis".

Expand full comment

Neither Eunice Foote, the discoverer of CO2 and water vapor as greenhouse games, in the mid 1800s nor Svante Arrhenius, the first to calculate how much doubling the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere would raise Earth's temperature, did so expecting to gain anything financially.

Expand full comment

Very well stated. I was skeptical after I got the virus in late January, 2020. As an Uber/Lyft driver, several times a week I picked up passengers from Philadelphia Airport, often Asians from flights overseas.

I thought I only had a bad flu, and by February 1st it was over. Though I felt healthy again, my sense of smell and taste vanished. Even now it's only 25% of what it had been.

When the lockdowns and masking began, I was very alarmed. Never in history were healthy people quarantined en masse, and nationally. The panic created by authorities was also extremely suspicious, as was the condemnation of widely available anti-malarial drugs in use for 60 years. The moving goalposts of "bending the curve" also proved malicious intent. By June, Uber and Lyft demand was down 70%, and it never really came back. This ongoing catastrophe is the greatest crime in human history.

Expand full comment

Yours is probably the 10,000 anecdote I've read of people who suspect they had this virus before this virus was supposed to even exist or be spreading. I hope future podcasts will look into the evidence that perhaps millions of people had already been infected by January 2020. You can interview me on this topic.

To Dr. Yeadon, I would note while I think many millions of people had already contracted this virus, very few were dying from it. So the IFR was much lower than we were told. And the greatest scandal might be the iatrogenic death scandal.

Good luck with this important venture!

Expand full comment

Bill. Please read my comment on the complete history of calculating the correct IFR. It's in here somewhere; long but good reading. Also Dr. Bhattacharya and I addressed the issue of when the virus arrived based on the number of people infected on what date in our 24 hours of videos. There were tens of thousands at least, on January 1.; probably millions

And nobody noticed

The virus was out and circulating much, much earlier than people think. And then we have Dr. Reiner and Bill Gates saying in OCTOBER of 2020 that we needed more contact tracing! It was too late for contact tracing in January of 2020.

Expand full comment

sorry everyone! it's on the Rav post where he talks about Sam Harris!

Expand full comment

Prof. Steven Pelech was interviewed on CHD.tv last Friday. His lab has good analytical methods for antibodies, and he relates the progress of exposure through 2019 and 2020.

Expand full comment

Thanks. You don't happen to have a good link do you? I haven't found many other people who have dove deeply into the possibility the antibody tests are NOT or did not capture all of the people who had been infected pre-official Covid.

Expand full comment

Interesting article, thanks. The article certainly leaves me with a healthy suspicion of the medical profession, especially since the unreasonable Covid plandemic mandates.

In Canada many well-informed doctors who voiced their concerns, were excoriated and even fired by the socialist medical system here.

My late husband who was a veterinary scientist with a degree in physiology, trained in South Africa, always maintained that most of the scientific papers published were not worth the paper they were written on. He knew before most medical doctors woke up, that the mRNA vaccine + Spike protein was very harmful . All of our family therefore avoided being vaccinated. Makers of the vaccine did not follow standard safety protocols which needed at least 4 years to develop, as well as trials being cancelled if a small percentage of people had an adverse reactions.

Of course, now people need multiple vaccines, which still don’t prevent them from getting sick, or even dying. Too many practitioners giving the shots don’t care if it is given in veins instead of in the muscle. Therein lies the danger.

Where is the logic that healthy unvaccinated people are harming others?

“It’s not the responsibility of the unvaccinated to protect the vaccinated; that is the vaccine’s job.” (quote from Pandata.org)

Lastly, the food pyramid that put carbohydrates at the top and fat at the bottom, is what veterinarians use to fatten calves. There is no such thing as a carbohydrate deficiency for humans.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Very sad - I am sure each death is good news for Trudeau , Gates and their WEF cohorts, since ‘population control’ was the purpose of the plandemic, IMO.

Expand full comment

Hi Jay,

You were at Cornell University a short while back and towards the end of the conference you praised Cornell's Covid policy.

Here is your exact quote:

"As I said, I admired the Cornell response while watching it from, from Stanford. It's a tremendously difficult choice with constraints from, from all over the place and manage that as best as possible. There's no way to do it perfectly where everyone's happy. This was just not possible. And David, you handled with grace."

That is a disgusting quote. I guess for you forcing students to take an experimental injection was admirable? Was the fact that Cornell fired staff who refused the injection just a "difficult choice?"

In August of 2020 you advocated for masks, partial lockdowns/restrictions and (anti) social distancing.

That was then and has always been a repulsive position.

How do you claim to be in any way oppostional to policies that you have supported?

You may also want to take a hard look at actual data which illustrates clearly that there was never a pandemic- and many of us spoke about this in Spring 2020.

Expand full comment

Yes! Agree

Expand full comment

Tyranny. It has been the obvious overthrow of America with all the marxist methods used over the last three years to bring in a tyrannical government. Thankfully, the Great Awakening will overcome them.

Expand full comment

My experience in my practice was that many of my patients in their 80's got covid and did fine. They suffered for a few days, then recovered. I believe that we need far more scientific investigation to look at genetic and comorbidity effects. I think that covert chronic inflammation, something present to a huge degree in our western societies due to stresses of all kinds, including poor nutrition over a lifetime, no exercise, poor sleep, little or no social network, all are factors in susceptibility and immune resilience in the face of a bug like covid, lab made or not.

Expand full comment

From my obrservation, the problem with this so called consensus, as you call it (love the phrase), it led to an accepted level of discrimination against those who did not consent.

Expand full comment
May 4, 2023·edited May 4, 2023

We were warned that "Nazi Germany" COULD happen here (in the U.S. and the West). But, by mutual consensus and/or consent, most refused to believe it, and went along with the standard, "blinders-on", deep-in-avoidance-and-denial "reality". The REAL TRUTH, and TRUE REALITY, that sets us free, was never really a "thing" with most people, so the masses fall for it again---the corporate-fascist complete takeover, this time of the entire world, but particularly of the West---and are willingly, blindly and/or passively, marching to their demise as in days not so long ago.

The consensus, obviously, should be with the REAL TRUTH and TRUE REALITY; but, alas, sadly it never is. Most have been thoroughly conditioned to want to be told what to do, what to believe and how to respond, by people who don't truly have their best interests at heart, but are using them to promote an agenda and get most people completely compliant. It works like a charm. The Nazis, who never went away, learned this, and are now using it to "good", and quite successful, effect, inexorably and horribly bringing most of us to our knees, just as designed for a very long time. They want everyone under absolute subjugation and control, and won't be satisfied with anything less.

The PTB, the now "Fourth Reich", aka the billionaire, soon to be trillionaire, psychopathic eugenicist, globalist class, who envision, and are so far bringing about, almost unobstructed, most of us being exterminated. As I alluded to, they have had this agenda for over a hundred years; and, now, they have co-opted most Western and other government bureaucracies, the think tanks, the universities, the NGOs, and so on, all the way down to the blindly-government-and-false-propaganda-trusting, already-enslaved "Proles". The "intelligence" agencies were on board from the start. Now these "neo-Nazis" are carrying out their coup d'gras, in their very well organized, well carried out global(ist) coup d'etat; and, thus, if we aren't already, we will soon be under absolute "Fourth Reich" control and lockdown. Unless We the People of the world put a stop to it. Will we?

Expand full comment

Yes, We the people, are the only ones who can stop the psychopaths. They have all the wealth and power, but we have the enormous numbers...billions of people. And we also have RIGHT and TRUTH. We need to stand up to the very few, or bow down to slavery. Choose now.

Expand full comment

Consensus is never or rarely a finding of truth. The definition of consensus itself precludes that:




con·​sen·​sus kən-ˈsen(t)-səs

often attributive

Synonyms of consensus:

1 a: general agreement : UNANIMITY

1 b: the judgment arrived at by most of those concerned

2: group solidarity in sentiment and belief

A consensus is definitionally an opinion. Of a group. Expressing solidarity in their beliefs. Belief and truth are not synonymous. Often exclusionary of one another.

This one image from my recent stack on consensus says the thousand words in it:



Expand full comment

This is the story that needs to get out. Who cares about what “real” science is when we’re all enslaved by the digital gulag and can’t even access bread without submitting to another toxic “vaccine”?

Expand full comment

They irony of this article being entitled the dangerous illusion of scientific consensus and then ball-parking the scientific consensus driven narrative of 1 in a million is hilarious. While then also pointing to an article that sites injury in two other vaccines as 1 in 100,000.

Do you think this is pharma’s first rodeo? The childhood vaccine schedule is is rolled out to developing children, which is front loaded in the first non verbal year. Those that can’t express what’s happening to their body. I suppose we are “lucky” that the Covid vax was given to the entire population of healthy adults that can verbalize what’s happening in their body. We have SADS on top of having SIDS now.

I hope these critical thinkers can look at other scientific consensus’s.

Expand full comment

Came here to say the exact same thing. Even if it IS one in a million, highly doubtful, who the heck thinks it’s a good idea to hide the fact that vaccines have killed people to prevent vaccine hesitancy?!? That’s not informed consent. What if it’s you or your kid? In what universe is that ethical? I’m so done with the idea that some of us just have to take one for the team. Total BS. Fix your product you dumbshits. Then people won’t have a reason to be “hesitant.”Mandates and indemnity is not free market economics. I’m embarrassed I didn’t know this years ago. If a possible side effect is death, there is not one good reason I should pull the trigger on that pistol. Not one. And I’m talking about all vaccines here, not just this latest catastrophe, which thank all the gods finally prompted me to get my head out of the sand.

Expand full comment

Where are all the court proceedings against the Pharma and Health Authorities? The lack of informed consent would be a good cause for starters. Among others small children and babies with all their lives ahead having been pushed this poisonous brew. Also, the fertility question in doubt, well not so any more.....hereditary next with implications for humanity`s survival?

Expand full comment

Expert opinion is counted as the worst form of evidence even by the "experts". That alone should tell you how reliable "expertise" is.


The people who say "trust the experts" are really just saying "trust me"--because even the experts amongst themselves do not trust the experts.

Expand full comment

Let's be honest about the gold-standard randomized clinical trial mortality results for mRNA vaccines (the ONLY mortality data that are not compromised by healthy vaccine user bias and a whole host of other fatal flaws). In the Pfizer and Moderna gold-standard randomized clinical trials, the older age groups had EXCESS ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY WITH VACCINATION (compared to placebo), even at the height of the pandemic and at peak vaccine effectiveness. In the two clinical trials combined, among the OLDER age groups, there were 21 deaths in the vaccine groups versus 16 deaths in the placebo groups. A 31% INCREASE in all-cause mortality with the "lifesaving" vaccine, in the OLDER age groups. And please, let's not bring the ridiculous "it's not statistically significant" cop-out (translation: "we only have perhaps 75% confidence, instead of the magic 95% confidence, that mRNA vaccines kill more elderly people than they save, therefore all is good and elderly should get the mRNA vaccine"). Would you bring the "it's not statistically significant" card if these results were for ivermectin, or masks, for that matter? Of course not, so don't bring it now just to protect Big Pharma's beloved mRNA vaccine$.

Among the older age group (>65) in the Moderna RCT, there were 9 deaths in the vaccine group versus 6 deaths in the placebo group. https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2113017/suppl_file/nejmoa2113017_appendix.pdf - see page 53, Table S19

Among the older age group (>55) in the Pfizer RCT, there were 12 deaths in the vaccine group versus 10 deaths in the placebo group. https://www.fda.gov/media/152256/download - see page 57, BOTTOM of Table 25

And finally, the same age-related trend appears in VAERS as well, over 70% of unexpected post-vaccine deaths with known ages were in people aged >65 (and about 90% with known ages were in people over age 50). https://openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality

Expand full comment

SEF, did you happen to see the 24 hours of discussions/debates I did with Dr. Bhattacharya over the winter and spring of 2021/2022? I brought these stats up to him, arguing the case that the vaccines caused more death (from all causes) than the placebo. He said none of it was statistically-significant. I meant to make an analogy with card counting but we went on to more suggestive evidence. It can be calculated as a percent likelihood, of course , and when you have many examples, it becomes overwhelming

Expand full comment

They can't exist without illusions they create. All of it crumbles like the illusion that all of these major global chaotic events happening at once is just organic and uncontrollable.

Expand full comment