(Note: "Gender-Affirming Care" is the Madison Avenue makeover of Eugenics Buck v. Bell "Sterilization of Imbeciles" as "Death with Dignity" is Madmen "Eugenics Euthanasia of Useless Eaters")
Take a listen to this legislative hearing from 2023. More Madison Avenue at work, "Nonconsensual Intimate Examinations" is aka "Sexual Assault." As disgusted as the Health Committee Chairman and other committee members were, the bill failed. Still lawful in MA, and most states, despite public hearing disclosures like this:
Massachusetts 2023 H.2146 / S.1333
An Act prohibiting nonconsensual intimate examinations of anesthetized or unconscious patients
A whole lot of hubris and blind spots in life-and-death professions filled with practitioners who believe Man is supreme over God. The ultimate hubris. The type of hubris that got Lucifer kicked out of God's Kingdom. And takes over the hearts and minds of hubristic men (and women.) Are Doctors EVER Right?
All that hubris can't even tell the difference between boys and girls - official policy - and performs gynecological exams on "chest-feeding" 'men' and prostate exams on 'women.' It's a demonstrably unserious 'science' entrusted with profoundly serious care. With huge sums of money at stake. A recipe for disastrous crimes against humanity.
As a pediatrician who was very vocal against masking kids and lockdown from the earliest months of the pandemic, I very much appreciate Dr Makary’s work on this! I agree with so much of what he writes and thank you for having him. However, I have one small bone to pick, based n his recent interview with the wonderful Allie Beth Stuckey. Maybe he will see this comment and be able to reply.
He referenced several times a Mayo study that found early antibiotic use in kids was linked to 40% increase in ADHD. I respectfully think that going around telling general audiences this kind of nonsense is seriously damaging to the legitimate cause of anti-establishment medicine.
Why is it nonsense? Well, besides the fact that it’s a retrospective cohort study, which is far far far from a legitimate approach and is precisely the kind of garbage research the establishment used for years to put out silly studies about butter/eggs/coffee/etc being good for you/bad for you/etc etc… it’s a nonsensical claim on its face because ADHD is a total scam that doesn’t exist.
So what’s the claim, that amoxicillin at 4 months makes you grow up into a far more intelligent, imaginative, adventurous boy who won’t sit still for a dumb teacher’s boring lecture? That early antibiotic use makes the government assign you an imbecile teacher who doesn’t know what real children are like and drugs the souls out of them?
Sorry, end of my rant, but don’t buy into the medical establishment’s war on childhood masquerading as “ADHD treatment” ; )
It’s understandable that you feel concerned about the role of the government in cyberspace, especially as technology continues to advance and expand. Governments worldwide, including the U.S., have increasingly leveraged digital technologies for surveillance, data collection, and influence. This has led to a growing sense of unease among many who worry about privacy, control, and the potential misuse of technology. Here are a few areas where government activities in cyberspace can indeed raise concerns:
1. Surveillance: Government surveillance has expanded significantly, especially since the revelations by Edward Snowden in 2013. Programs like PRISM showed the extent to which governments monitor online communications, sometimes without the knowledge or consent of their citizens. This raises concerns about privacy, data security, and civil liberties.
2. Cyber Warfare: Governments, including the U.S., have been engaging in cyber warfare, which involves hacking, cyber espionage, and the development of digital weapons. These activities have the potential to disrupt critical infrastructure, financial systems, and even personal data.
3. Disinformation Campaigns: There are also growing concerns about governments using cyberspace to spread disinformation and manipulate public opinion, either through social media platforms or other online channels. These campaigns can erode trust in institutions and destabilize societies.
4. Digital Footprints and Data Collection: Many worry about how governments access and use vast amounts of personal data collected by tech companies. This data can be used for various purposes, including tracking individuals and monitoring their activities, which can feel intrusive and dangerous to some.
The concerns you have about the dangers in cyberspace are shared by many around the world. Protecting yourself with strong digital privacy measures, such as using encrypted communication, VPNs, and privacy-focused platforms, can help safeguard your information.
If you’d like more resources or ideas on how to protect yourself in this digital environment, feel free to ask!
The peanut allergy story is not complete without including the role of vaccination. The question is: Even if a child does not eat penauts for the first couple of years, why should she be allergic to peanuts later?
This question is addressed by the 'dual allergen exposure hypothesis' which posits that tolerance to antigens occurs in the neonate through high-dose oral exposure and that allergic sensitisation occurs through low dose cutaneous exposure. With a bit of oversimplification, this idea can be stated as follows: "If you ingest a food protein first, you develop tolerance; if you inject a food protein first, you develop an allergy."
How do we expose infants to food proteins via non-oral routes? There seem to be at least two sources. First, there are food proteins (including peanut proteins) found in house dust which can sensitize an infant through the skin, especially if the infant has broken skin or eczema. The second source is childhood vaccines. These vaccines contain trace amounts of peanut, egg, cow milk, and other food proteins because of how they are manufactured.
To avoid peanut (and other food) allergies, start feeding the baby these foods (peanuts, eggs, cow milk, ectc.) as early as 3-4 months of age. Moreover, delay any vaccination until two months after all these foods have been introduced. The baby should have no food allergies! (verified anecdoatally).
For some reason just within the last week or so every time I try to click through a link to watch a video on YouTube it keeps asking me to sign in but yet it doesn’t allow me to sign in through Substack.
A story about hubris within the medical establishment...leading with hubris, "Are Doctors Always Right?"
From where I sit a more humble presentation would've led with, "Are Doctors EVER Right?"
Allopathy has a terrible track record. Since Rockefeller and the Flexners decided man's petrochemicals were better medicine than what God provided.
Why did so many German doctors join the Nazi Party early?
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, October 3, 2012
https://sci-hub.se/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.09.022,
(Note: "Gender-Affirming Care" is the Madison Avenue makeover of Eugenics Buck v. Bell "Sterilization of Imbeciles" as "Death with Dignity" is Madmen "Eugenics Euthanasia of Useless Eaters")
Take a listen to this legislative hearing from 2023. More Madison Avenue at work, "Nonconsensual Intimate Examinations" is aka "Sexual Assault." As disgusted as the Health Committee Chairman and other committee members were, the bill failed. Still lawful in MA, and most states, despite public hearing disclosures like this:
Massachusetts 2023 H.2146 / S.1333
An Act prohibiting nonconsensual intimate examinations of anesthetized or unconscious patients
Committee on Public Health, 9/20/2023
https://malegislature.gov/Events/Hearings/Detail/4682
(Timestamp Begin 03:24:40 - 03:34:30 End)
THIS is the Blind Spot of Modern Medicine, inherent in the Rockefeller medicine model that declares Man "fixes" God's "mistakes."
Modern Medicine that is "Good without God":
https://ijr.com/anthony-fauci-claims-no-longer-needs-church-personal-ethics-enough/
https://www.sltrib.com/religion/2021/07/01/dr-anthony-fauci-named/
There's even entire religions that are "good without god," like the interfaith ones:
https://www.interfaithamerica.org/article/dr-anthony-fauci-named-2021-humanist-of-the-year/
A whole lot of hubris and blind spots in life-and-death professions filled with practitioners who believe Man is supreme over God. The ultimate hubris. The type of hubris that got Lucifer kicked out of God's Kingdom. And takes over the hearts and minds of hubristic men (and women.) Are Doctors EVER Right?
All that hubris can't even tell the difference between boys and girls - official policy - and performs gynecological exams on "chest-feeding" 'men' and prostate exams on 'women.' It's a demonstrably unserious 'science' entrusted with profoundly serious care. With huge sums of money at stake. A recipe for disastrous crimes against humanity.
As a pediatrician who was very vocal against masking kids and lockdown from the earliest months of the pandemic, I very much appreciate Dr Makary’s work on this! I agree with so much of what he writes and thank you for having him. However, I have one small bone to pick, based n his recent interview with the wonderful Allie Beth Stuckey. Maybe he will see this comment and be able to reply.
He referenced several times a Mayo study that found early antibiotic use in kids was linked to 40% increase in ADHD. I respectfully think that going around telling general audiences this kind of nonsense is seriously damaging to the legitimate cause of anti-establishment medicine.
Why is it nonsense? Well, besides the fact that it’s a retrospective cohort study, which is far far far from a legitimate approach and is precisely the kind of garbage research the establishment used for years to put out silly studies about butter/eggs/coffee/etc being good for you/bad for you/etc etc… it’s a nonsensical claim on its face because ADHD is a total scam that doesn’t exist.
So what’s the claim, that amoxicillin at 4 months makes you grow up into a far more intelligent, imaginative, adventurous boy who won’t sit still for a dumb teacher’s boring lecture? That early antibiotic use makes the government assign you an imbecile teacher who doesn’t know what real children are like and drugs the souls out of them?
Sorry, end of my rant, but don’t buy into the medical establishment’s war on childhood masquerading as “ADHD treatment” ; )
It’s understandable that you feel concerned about the role of the government in cyberspace, especially as technology continues to advance and expand. Governments worldwide, including the U.S., have increasingly leveraged digital technologies for surveillance, data collection, and influence. This has led to a growing sense of unease among many who worry about privacy, control, and the potential misuse of technology. Here are a few areas where government activities in cyberspace can indeed raise concerns:
1. Surveillance: Government surveillance has expanded significantly, especially since the revelations by Edward Snowden in 2013. Programs like PRISM showed the extent to which governments monitor online communications, sometimes without the knowledge or consent of their citizens. This raises concerns about privacy, data security, and civil liberties.
2. Cyber Warfare: Governments, including the U.S., have been engaging in cyber warfare, which involves hacking, cyber espionage, and the development of digital weapons. These activities have the potential to disrupt critical infrastructure, financial systems, and even personal data.
3. Disinformation Campaigns: There are also growing concerns about governments using cyberspace to spread disinformation and manipulate public opinion, either through social media platforms or other online channels. These campaigns can erode trust in institutions and destabilize societies.
4. Digital Footprints and Data Collection: Many worry about how governments access and use vast amounts of personal data collected by tech companies. This data can be used for various purposes, including tracking individuals and monitoring their activities, which can feel intrusive and dangerous to some.
The concerns you have about the dangers in cyberspace are shared by many around the world. Protecting yourself with strong digital privacy measures, such as using encrypted communication, VPNs, and privacy-focused platforms, can help safeguard your information.
If you’d like more resources or ideas on how to protect yourself in this digital environment, feel free to ask!
Hubris infects the medical profession. Watch Turfseer’s music video MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY DISEASE. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/my-way-or-the-highway-disease
Medicated Normal. Such a revealing program. Thank you.
The peanut allergy story is not complete without including the role of vaccination. The question is: Even if a child does not eat penauts for the first couple of years, why should she be allergic to peanuts later?
This question is addressed by the 'dual allergen exposure hypothesis' which posits that tolerance to antigens occurs in the neonate through high-dose oral exposure and that allergic sensitisation occurs through low dose cutaneous exposure. With a bit of oversimplification, this idea can be stated as follows: "If you ingest a food protein first, you develop tolerance; if you inject a food protein first, you develop an allergy."
How do we expose infants to food proteins via non-oral routes? There seem to be at least two sources. First, there are food proteins (including peanut proteins) found in house dust which can sensitize an infant through the skin, especially if the infant has broken skin or eczema. The second source is childhood vaccines. These vaccines contain trace amounts of peanut, egg, cow milk, and other food proteins because of how they are manufactured.
To avoid peanut (and other food) allergies, start feeding the baby these foods (peanuts, eggs, cow milk, ectc.) as early as 3-4 months of age. Moreover, delay any vaccination until two months after all these foods have been introduced. The baby should have no food allergies! (verified anecdoatally).
For some reason just within the last week or so every time I try to click through a link to watch a video on YouTube it keeps asking me to sign in but yet it doesn’t allow me to sign in through Substack.