Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tina Stolberg's avatar

Personally, I would name names at this point. We are in a war. I get that you hope to publish and get paid for a future article but this will never move the needle. In any case, don't let a good article go to waste, my suggestion is publish your piece on X and ask readers to guess which main stream media wouldn't accept it. Could be fun!

Expand full comment
Adrian Gaty's avatar

Rav, I feel your pain! I'm so sorry. I had a piece I was working on for *months* with a major media outlet you would all know. It was on ADHD and the overdrugging of children. First they made me take out all spiritual references, then they made me take out all criticisms of modern education, then they made me take out all historical references to past episodes when medical consensus was wrong, until there was nothing left but the most tame, anodyne, generic, dumbed-down story - and then they killed even that. And each month, each step of the way, they were like, "we love this idea, we loves this story, it's just that our readers probably won't be comfortable with this xyz part... blah blah blah" until there was nothing left. infuriating.

and if you want a really funny one, I have a book on this topic. no joke, this is what one of the country's most prominent literary agents said about my book in 2020, just before Covid madness took off: "I’ve been reading tonight and I’m knocked out. This is brilliant. Yes it’s about ADHD but it’s about much more than that. [...] This is a work that can have great impact. And you’re a great storyteller with a wonderful narrative voice."

record scratch, fast forward to 2024, the exact same agent, responding to my polite inquiry about the exact same manuscript, and why he hasn't been pitching it: "the execution makes this a high bar for publishing, at least from a mainstream publisher. I’m all for strong opinions but I think here the inflammatory perspective interferes with the argument and works against you. The larger story of “the end of childhood” is especially powerful. But it’s so hard-edged and one-sided that i’m skeptical readers will come to this."

Again, literally the exact same book, read by the exact same person. But one was before Covid drove all the groupthink lemmings insane, and one was after, when criticizing any pharmaceutical is now "inflammatory" and unfit for mainstream publishing.

To repeat, I feel your pain. Here's hoping the truth will be allowed to get out somewhere other than substack!

Expand full comment
114 more comments...

No posts