Why did you attack Pierre Kory on Tucker Carlson and use the precious few minutes of air time planting doubt in people's mind about the value of Ivermectin when he is as credentialed and honest as he is -- and of course, 100% correct?
I will pose a question as simply as I can: Alex, why were you so quick to recognize and analyze the deficiencies and fraud within the mRNA vaccine trials (and all the subsequent ridiculous claims of efficacy and safety by Pharma, media, and the health agencies) yet are unable to see the same fraud in the big (not small and independant/unconflicted) ivermectin trials? Why cannot you understand this as two sides of the same coin?
I also read the studies "disproving" ivermectin, and immediately understood the methodological problems with those studies (Myth #7) particularly in regards to under dosing, dose timing, blinding, etc. I've only been reading such studies for 45 or so years. These studies were designed to fail, even the TOGETHER trial, where Ed Mills supposedly conferred with people prescribing ivermectin. Mills didn't. And that trial's methods were an absolute mess.
So not being a clinician treating C19 patients (like internist Pierre Kory) and not being a scientist, who actually could critically assess the methodologies of the papers he was reading (like microbiologist Joomi Kim), why was Alex so bold and downright arrogant with his conclusions about ivermectin?
Alex obviously was unqualified to be so absolute. And then he went onto promote Paxlovid, that in a recently released Pfizer RCT had NO benefit over placebo. This was after all the rebound issues with that super expensive drug.
It was a real shame that Berenson chose to be so confrontational on ivermectin as well as toward Dr. Robert Malone, since I tuned him out after that. This was despite agreeing with him on a number of other topics as I noted in this old blog from 10/2021 https://beyondspin.wordpress.com/2021/10/16/rogan-berenson-and-leaky-vaccines/
As a side note, please have Joomi Kim on your podcast. Her blog "Let's Be Clear" was and is one of the best blogs on substack especially when it comes to breaking down scientific literature to make it more accessible to non-scientists. Alex would have benefited from reading her substack given his lack of scientific literacy especially on the 13 Myths many of which he frequently repeated.
Are you controlled opposition? On the three most important issues you disagree with the experts (1. Early treatments that work therefore no EUA needed for jabs / 2. Excess deaths are real / 3. Fertility has declined – great increase in couples unable to get pregnant/increase in miscarriages & stillborn). You say that none of this is true when you are given air-time. Yet you won't debate Steve Kirsch on these issues. These are the *key* issues that will have everyone marching in the streets and would bring down a government if people knew. Yet, you shoot anyone down on these issues if you get a few minutes of air-time. You focus instead on less horrific issues – censorship, the jabs can kill on ‘rare’ occasions, etc. So question: Are you controlled opposition, working for PsyOps Defence Forces -- putting up a very clever front so that people will trust you and then believe you on the three most important issues? If not, are you an unwitting asset being used by them? ( It doesn’t really stack up that you can be such a clear thinker on so many issues, and yet despite the clear evidence presented by Ed Dowd, Steve Kirsch, Pierre Kory on the most important issues you don’t agree with them.)
Alex - Can you next be Weed's Wrongest Man? Your insights into the dangers of high THC cannabis are invaluable. The way things are going, it's only going to get worse. People have no idea how dangerous the stuff is, especially to our precious youngsters' developing brains. Johnny's Ambassadors is helping to lead the way in awareness. Thanks for all you do!
Are you aware of the collaboration between the WHO and Uttar Pradesh using a Covid treatment protocol which included Ivermectin that basically eradicated Covid there? 70,000 health care workers took IVM as a prophylactic then went village to village, door to door rapid testing and handing out “first aid kits” Ingredients IVM, doxycycline, zinc, Vitamin D, C, gloves, masks, paracetamol.
I would be very interested in Alex's thoughts on the most important elements of a reform agenda for public health. Here in British Columbia, for example, the powers provided to the Provincial Health Officer under the Public Health Act effectively permitted a single person to suspend Charter Rights for the whole Province for months on the say so of a single person, with no political approval or oversight. I am thinking of measures like: time limited periods for declarations of public health emergencies; mandatory reviews at the legislative level for extensions; mandatory release of all "homework" behind decisions; mandatory formation of independent medical advisory commissions, separate from and not beholden to public health officials; etc. Alex's thoughts would be very welcome on these matters.
Ask Alex why he’s so willing to get in the ‘mud’ on X - He calls people names (‘bitch’ and ‘fatso’) which seems so weird for someone of Alex’s talent - where is all the rage coming from?
And by the way, I suffer from a skin condition called rosacea which causes redness and small pustules on the face. My GP never suggested any treatment except to stop drinking. A skin cancer specialist took one look (incidental to the main purpose of the consultation) and prescribed a 1% ivermectin face cream. Cured my rosacea within a month of daily application. Ivermectin is a highly effective anti-inflammatory and antiparasitic.
This is not some kind of sales pitch, just an observation. The doctor and I had a good laugh at the characterization of ivermectin as "horse de-wormer". Man, do I hate the MSM for their mendacity.
My question: how do you differentiate beteeen the states of „I 100% know“, „I strongly believe“ and „I have an assumption“ .. (and maybe more states of facticity / scientific evidence)?
Why did you attack Pierre Kory on Tucker Carlson and use the precious few minutes of air time planting doubt in people's mind about the value of Ivermectin when he is as credentialed and honest as he is -- and of course, 100% correct?
Why did you attack Kevin McKernan the genomics guy?
I think it is becuase he is is controlled opposition. Doing a great job too, even getting invited by Jay and Rav here.
I will pose a question as simply as I can: Alex, why were you so quick to recognize and analyze the deficiencies and fraud within the mRNA vaccine trials (and all the subsequent ridiculous claims of efficacy and safety by Pharma, media, and the health agencies) yet are unable to see the same fraud in the big (not small and independant/unconflicted) ivermectin trials? Why cannot you understand this as two sides of the same coin?
Thanks, Pierre. I’ll ask him. Would you potentially even be up for a discussion with him moderated by me in the future?
Please do!! Time for a rematch!
BOOM!
Berenson often repeated what Joomi Kim referred to as the "13 myths about ivermectin that just won't die" https://joomi.substack.com/p/13-myths-about-ivermectin-that-just especially myths #2, #3, #5, #6, #7 & #13.
I also read the studies "disproving" ivermectin, and immediately understood the methodological problems with those studies (Myth #7) particularly in regards to under dosing, dose timing, blinding, etc. I've only been reading such studies for 45 or so years. These studies were designed to fail, even the TOGETHER trial, where Ed Mills supposedly conferred with people prescribing ivermectin. Mills didn't. And that trial's methods were an absolute mess.
So not being a clinician treating C19 patients (like internist Pierre Kory) and not being a scientist, who actually could critically assess the methodologies of the papers he was reading (like microbiologist Joomi Kim), why was Alex so bold and downright arrogant with his conclusions about ivermectin?
Alex obviously was unqualified to be so absolute. And then he went onto promote Paxlovid, that in a recently released Pfizer RCT had NO benefit over placebo. This was after all the rebound issues with that super expensive drug.
It was a real shame that Berenson chose to be so confrontational on ivermectin as well as toward Dr. Robert Malone, since I tuned him out after that. This was despite agreeing with him on a number of other topics as I noted in this old blog from 10/2021 https://beyondspin.wordpress.com/2021/10/16/rogan-berenson-and-leaky-vaccines/
As a side note, please have Joomi Kim on your podcast. Her blog "Let's Be Clear" was and is one of the best blogs on substack especially when it comes to breaking down scientific literature to make it more accessible to non-scientists. Alex would have benefited from reading her substack given his lack of scientific literacy especially on the 13 Myths many of which he frequently repeated.
Are you controlled opposition? On the three most important issues you disagree with the experts (1. Early treatments that work therefore no EUA needed for jabs / 2. Excess deaths are real / 3. Fertility has declined – great increase in couples unable to get pregnant/increase in miscarriages & stillborn). You say that none of this is true when you are given air-time. Yet you won't debate Steve Kirsch on these issues. These are the *key* issues that will have everyone marching in the streets and would bring down a government if people knew. Yet, you shoot anyone down on these issues if you get a few minutes of air-time. You focus instead on less horrific issues – censorship, the jabs can kill on ‘rare’ occasions, etc. So question: Are you controlled opposition, working for PsyOps Defence Forces -- putting up a very clever front so that people will trust you and then believe you on the three most important issues? If not, are you an unwitting asset being used by them? ( It doesn’t really stack up that you can be such a clear thinker on so many issues, and yet despite the clear evidence presented by Ed Dowd, Steve Kirsch, Pierre Kory on the most important issues you don’t agree with them.)
Alex - Can you next be Weed's Wrongest Man? Your insights into the dangers of high THC cannabis are invaluable. The way things are going, it's only going to get worse. People have no idea how dangerous the stuff is, especially to our precious youngsters' developing brains. Johnny's Ambassadors is helping to lead the way in awareness. Thanks for all you do!
Are you aware of the collaboration between the WHO and Uttar Pradesh using a Covid treatment protocol which included Ivermectin that basically eradicated Covid there? 70,000 health care workers took IVM as a prophylactic then went village to village, door to door rapid testing and handing out “first aid kits” Ingredients IVM, doxycycline, zinc, Vitamin D, C, gloves, masks, paracetamol.
Less than 7% vaccination rate at the time.
Population 220,000,000.
Why are you so afraid of Ivermectin?
I would be very interested in Alex's thoughts on the most important elements of a reform agenda for public health. Here in British Columbia, for example, the powers provided to the Provincial Health Officer under the Public Health Act effectively permitted a single person to suspend Charter Rights for the whole Province for months on the say so of a single person, with no political approval or oversight. I am thinking of measures like: time limited periods for declarations of public health emergencies; mandatory reviews at the legislative level for extensions; mandatory release of all "homework" behind decisions; mandatory formation of independent medical advisory commissions, separate from and not beholden to public health officials; etc. Alex's thoughts would be very welcome on these matters.
Ask Alex why he’s so willing to get in the ‘mud’ on X - He calls people names (‘bitch’ and ‘fatso’) which seems so weird for someone of Alex’s talent - where is all the rage coming from?
Hi Rav,
Can you please ask Alex for a timeline of the pandemic. A visual timeline would help understand, in his view, the pertinent points.
Sure
Thank you. Rav what happened in Dr. Kaur's case. I have not been able to see the ruling. She is so brave.🙏
What happened to Moderna’s EBV trial? You reported that they halted it due to adolescent myocarditis, I haven’t heard anything since then.
What first clued you in to the pandemic scam? In evaluating future government BS, what signs should we look for?
And by the way, I suffer from a skin condition called rosacea which causes redness and small pustules on the face. My GP never suggested any treatment except to stop drinking. A skin cancer specialist took one look (incidental to the main purpose of the consultation) and prescribed a 1% ivermectin face cream. Cured my rosacea within a month of daily application. Ivermectin is a highly effective anti-inflammatory and antiparasitic.
This is not some kind of sales pitch, just an observation. The doctor and I had a good laugh at the characterization of ivermectin as "horse de-wormer". Man, do I hate the MSM for their mendacity.
At stake is our autonomy from the WHO. What are your thoughts on giving them power to oversee pandemics? Do you know whether pharma funds the WHO?
Why did Berenson launch a jihad against Dr. Robert Malone?
Ditto the other commenters on the Ivermectin issue. This is big.
My question: how do you differentiate beteeen the states of „I 100% know“, „I strongly believe“ and „I have an assumption“ .. (and maybe more states of facticity / scientific evidence)?