US FDA's response is the typical well-honed lines that must have originally come from a clever strategic PR consultant. Even the way they engaged with you initially was also PR-orchestrated. It is obvious they are protecting their own jobs and possible movement through the revolving doors with pharma rather than protecting public health …
US FDA's response is the typical well-honed lines that must have originally come from a clever strategic PR consultant. Even the way they engaged with you initially was also PR-orchestrated. It is obvious they are protecting their own jobs and possible movement through the revolving doors with pharma rather than protecting public health and certainly not protecting children's health. Good job, Rav.
US FDA's response is the typical well-honed lines that must have originally come from a clever strategic PR consultant. Even the way they engaged with you initially was also PR-orchestrated. It is obvious they are protecting their own jobs and possible movement through the revolving doors with pharma rather than protecting public health and certainly not protecting children's health. Good job, Rav.