Hi everyone,
In this conversation with Sharyl Attkisson, I delve into how pharmaceutical companies manipulate media narratives through their advertising power, causing journalists to self-censor. We also examine how regulatory agencies like the FDA and CDC are influenced by pharmaceutical funding, which undermines public trust in their decisions. This episode highlights the pressing need for critical, independent thinking in healthcare to protect public interests.
Timestamps:
0:22 Intro to Sharyl Atkinson
4:00 Inundated by pharmaceutical ads
6:45 Side effects of pharmaceuticals
8:30 Governance compromised by corporations
12:53 FDA approval & corruption
20:00 Controversializing the use of ivermectin
23:03 The rush job of vaccines by the FDA
30:07 The CDC ignoring the science for profit
37:40 Risks of the small pox vaccine
40:00 Scapegoating critics as anti-vaxxers
44:00 Autism & the propaganda campaign
48:00 The Amish response to Covid
51:05 Premature school closures
54:30 Doctors turning a blind eye
01:00:00 Censorship of honest research
01:02:30 The value of critical thinking
Watch Now:
Are you currently taking a prescribed psychiatric medication, such as an antidepressant, ADHD medication, or anti-anxiety drug? Watch this film by our friends to learn about potential side effects that your doctor may not have mentioned. Watch now at this link.
Please return the true definition of vaccine back.
Great interview. I agree with most everything except this is not about pharmaceutical industry corruption. One should assume there are bad actors in every industry but it is not fair to characterize every pharma company as a bad actor. This is really about the failure of those responsible for protecting the public interest — the CDC and the FDA. If they did their jobs, many of these scandals (not all) would be prevented.