Initially released to paid members. Now available for everyone to watch on Rumble. A vital interview on the corrupt ties between the Biden admin White House and the FDA.
Most people are unaware of the difference between “authorization” and “approval”, and with our government and media shoving the shots down our throats it didn’t matter. Oh yes and the mandates..
I am curious where the data came from for the approval decision. Obviously not from VAERS. Also there is no medical code for vaccine injury. So if people are coming into hospital claiming adverse reaction from the shots unless it is reported to VAERS I’m assuming there’s no reference point. So where’s the data coming from?
Why does the analysis from the initially withheld safety data procured from FDA via lawsuit show little efficacy? And this gentleman feels the shots were the miracle worker? Not talking about the booster.
Was the review team aware of the change in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer shot prior to mass rollout?
Not impressed with his stance about young adults getting the shots and his myocarditis viewpoint.
The CDC knew in March 2021 about breakthrough infections and lack of disease protection.
It’s shocking that a product than offers 30% protection is considered “acceptable”. Yes, they raised the bar to 50% but still. Yet the public was lied to outright. Old news.
No the mandates did not cause people to dig in their heels. Their decision had been made early on. I’m sick of that blame game. And no that’s not what caused Covid to spread. That is a leaky “vaccine” so please stop already.
I actually listened to the whole show. In light of Peter Marks recent resignation or “being forced out” as the media says it, this podcast was enlightening to some degree.
Why is the data on vaccines at FDA proprietary IF the FDA is meant to protect and represent the American people. We don’t care about competition…we care about safety and efficacy. “Worth developing a vaccine” means FDA protects this information so competitors cannot emerge…how many better vaccines could get developed if this data was disclosed? ESPECIALLY in the case of a pandemic emergency! What the FDA is essentially doing is protecting the business interests of those pushing for mRNA approval (that is the promise the agency makes and inadvertently promotes these to enter the market). In all fairness there is really no way around this. This in some cases might be more egregious than recommending who should get it. In a pure scientific sense this will always be a conflict of interest that we might call “commercialized” science.
But from the start the shots were meant as protective not as neutralizing immunization. There was first an emphasis that it was protective for all and then the narrative shifted to protect against severe disease. But its original design was to protect against severe disease, NOT to truly immunize and protect against infection. Was the measurement confused that immunization against infection was the RCT, when in fact it was protection against severe disease. This was not clarified very well in the discussion. It is this detail that destroyed confidence in the system…because the mandate for all had to actually imply it was protective against infection, not severe disease and hospitalization. How efficacy was measured seemed mixed up by the people at the top?Many got shots and were infected…
What actually was the impetus for mandates? Above all it is this question that eroded public confidence in public health the most. Even the inserts that came with the shots said in print that the product should not have been coerced and should be taken from free will.
There was mention of lack of manufacturing data…this would be critical for completely new style of vaccine that requires the full intact mRNA to be stable and encapsulated in LNPs in vials that were stored frozen or cold chain?
Even to this day the biological mechanisms are unclear. New recent Akiko Iwasaki work comes to mind. How hard is it to have transparent info on manufacturing lots, full length in vitro transcription results, presence of remaining template plasmid DNA (how was it decided what level this should be?) and tracking the presence of full or partial spike protein after shots…in the peripheral blood as well as antibodies against it over time. Would love to hear more discussion on safety biology, not on efficacy. There is overemphasis on efficacy, not enough on safety (myocarditis was a minor part of the discussion).
An FDA review would only be as good as the data presented…which in some ways was a conflict of interest during that time: two companies being advocated, rushing data to review, how could the data have been top notch, when literally mRNA and it’s technology en masse had never been evaluated. Even “normal style” vaccines take considerable time and effort for full approval. Many vaccine creators openly were vocal about this and were censored. Including some who had attempted vaccination against sars1.
Why was only spike the main antigenic target…another mystery.
So based on Krause’s statement of having the data in front of them they DID make the best decision at the time, but the outcomes, goals, and pressure from the outside kept morphing. In all fairness it must have been difficult. But an FDA review needs more transparency: what about how data is produced? Absolute versus relative risk evaluation? Were the trial participants a good representation of the general population or just the vulnerable pop considering its true purpose was to prevent severe disease and hospitalization? Even 4y later so many things sound unclear. One thing was clear: the messaging was “commitment to science” but if this were true why was rigorous review overruled by the top down? This is the exact opposite of commitment to good science, debate, and safety.
The irony of the dialogue that FDA doesn’t recommend who should take shots and then the podcast ends with the former FDA regulator saying “FDA shouldn’t recommend” is then recommending a healthy 20yo college soccer player should take it based on risk benefit. Without any transparency about what this published risk/benefit is. I would wholeheartedly side with Rav on this one. I also think more rigorous study is needed on the claim that shots somehow lessened the myocarditis that would otherwise have happened without it…there is so much more nuance to this including those coerced to take the shot after being infected. Krause rightfully called this nonsense…so again the “blanket coverage” approach Rav mentions was just plain wrong.
One more nuance here is the risk benefit ratio is actually a marketing point for a product. If it was high and compelling (even without long term studies) it seems strange that ultimately it was mandated. There is always this question of who is protecting who with shots…but it always needs to be a decision of “I read the label and I decided yes or no to use this product to protect myself.”
Great discussion…while there was advocacy for more to be employed at FDA…perhaps there should just be more rigorous review to start…how many of these treatments coming in even deserve review to begin with? Generally though it seems like regulation would need to increase if increased confidence in public health and support for FDA will be restored?
..."The FDA's role is crucial for public health and safety."...there is no such thing as public safety. The only role of the FDA is to approve big pharma drugs no matter how deadly they are.
Witness mRNA poisons which no one in the FDA will ever admit that they are murder drugs. So much for stupid public safety. All I have control over is my safety...at least as far as making decisions about taking vaccines and drugs. I couldn't care less about anything the FDA, CDC or HHS says.
Crixcyon so true. It all boils down to your decision. The question was whether we were properly informed. In a clinical trial (including the ones that would have been conducted or EUA), consent is foremost for participation. Why then did consent evaporate if we hold it sacred in the “scientific process” but it no longer matters in the “real world?” In my biomedical ethics training the number one warning for clinical work is coercion without consent. If we are committed to a scientifically-ethically-centered world why would consent no longer matter.
Thank you to all the brave doctors & scientists and all the people of the world with curiosity, integrity, and strength of character who have risked so much to get this info out into the world.
The mRNA shots were/are always going to be an immunological catastrophe for humanity.
The mechanism of action (using mRNA instructions to turn one’s own cells into foreign non-self “spike protein factories”) is the primary mechanism of harm.
The primary danger of the COVID-19 mRNA injections has always been one’s own immune system’s attack response by the mighty CD8+ Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte cells (AKA Killer T-cells):
The COVID-19 mRNA injections must be recalled from the market and mRNA-based products must be banned because the modified mRNA-LNP genetic technology platform is fundamentally flawed & dangerous by design.
These modified mRNA-LNP COVID-19 injections, that trigger one's own immune system to attack & kill one's own formerly healthy cells (that have been instructed to produce/express foreign, non-self proteins), no matter where those cells are in the body, never should have been made available to the public in the first place.
When the (designed to be long-lasting) n1-methyl pseudouridine modified mRNA transfects one's cells, and gives instructions for the ribosomes to make & express foreign non-self proteins (such as the toxic SARS-CoV-2 spike protein), one's immune system sends the CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) to kill those formerly healthy cells that are now making & expressing non-self proteins.
It is the mission of these CD8+ CTLs to seek out and destroy any such transfected cell that is making foreign non-self proteins. That’s what they do…
Due to the biodistribution properties of the lipid nanoparticles, the encased modified mRNA can go anywhere in the body, including crossing the blood-brain and placental barriers...The LNP "delivery vehicles" traveled to different parts of the body in different people.
Expressing any foreign protein is fatal to the cell doing the expressing. The reason is, our bodies are protected by being able to distinguish ourselves from things that shouldn't be there. Anything non-self will trigger immune destruction of the cells & tissues involved.
Some people will express lots of foreign proteins in vulnerable locations. Others express less in less vulnerable areas.
The location of expression defines the adverse event: if you get foreign protein expression in your heart cells, you could get myocarditis & experience cardiac arrest; if the expression is in your brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nervous system, you could get one or more of a variety of neurological conditions; if in your eye, possible blindness; if in your ovaries, possible infertility; if in the placenta, possible miscarriage, stillbirth, or birth defects; if in the endothelial cells that line your blood vessels, possible vascular &/or microvascular injuries like clots/microclots or the long white fibrous clots, leading to strokes, heart attacks, or pulmonary embolisms…
If the expression of foreign proteins is in your own immune cells, you could experience immune dysfunction, dysregulation, & suppression including repeated infections, immune tolerance of a pathogenic foreign protein due to antibody subclass switch to IgG4 & increased IgG4-related diseases, T cell exhaustion, interference with & suppression of innate immunity, persistent systemic inflammation, dysregulation of toll-like receptors and reduced cancer surveillance or the suppression of tumor-suppressing immune system activities & cell-signaling (increasing your risk of fast-growing and aggressive cancers)…
And more…
There's no limit to the horrible consequences of injecting into your body something that triggers your own immune system to attack & kill your own formerly healthy cells & tissues.
The public “health” agencies, the COVID “authorities”, & the “mainstream” media fraudulently marketed these experimental mRNA gene “therapy” products as “safe & effective vaccines”. Trusting people thought that they were being presented with the choice (or the mandate) as to whether or not to take a “safe & effective vaccine”…But that was/is a deceptively false “choice”…
The COVID-19 mRNA injections are NOT safe, they are NOT effective, and they are NOT vaccines.
These modified mRNA-LNP gene “therapy” injections never would have passed proper safety studies required for gene therapy products. Safety studies (including biodistribution, immunogenicity, immunotoxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, shedding, long-term effects, & more) that were bypassed because of the fraudulent mislabeling as “vaccines”. (And because of the EUA & “countermeasure” designations under the Project BioShield Act & PREP Act).
NO ONE should have ever had the “choice” of taking these gene “therapy” injections because the modified mRNA-LNP genetic technology platform is fundamentally flawed & dangerous by design.
The danger is NOT limited to just getting more COVID “boosters”. ANY mRNA gene “therapy” product that transfects your cells and instructs those cells to produce foreign non-self proteins (ANY non-self protein) will trigger an immune system attack response against your own cells & tissues (the role of the Killer T-cells is to monitor ALL the cells of the body, ready to destroy/kill any that express foreign, non-self proteins). This makes EVERY mRNA-based injected product harmful by design.
No one who took these modified mRNA-LNP COVID injections made an informed decision. Most people had no clue about what they allowed to be injected into their bodies...
Also most people still do not understand that the devastating harms inflicted upon people over the last few years was intentional:
AFTER the mighty CD8+ Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte cells (AKA Killer T-cells) attack response to modified mRNA transfected cells of tissues & organs inside your body:
After the primary immune system attack response by the cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), resulting in varying degrees of tissue damage & pathology in different people, a lot happens...
The CTLs will not be able to kill every cell making non-self (spike) protein, so some amount of foreign (spike) protein will get made & released from your cells. That amount will also vary from person to person.
Specialized cells called antigen-presenting cells, especially dendritic cells and macrophages, spring into action. Long story short…you will get serum antibodies made against those foreign proteins which is the stated goal of any shot called a vaccine.
But that can take up to 2 weeks, and during that time, the foreign non-self (spike) proteins are biologically active and will attach to various cellular receptors, resulting in a whole new level of possible tissue destruction.
Now your immune system will activate macrophages & neutrophils that will kill THOSE cells through inflammatory pathways, regardless of whether or not the non-self proteins are toxic themselves.
And if the non-self proteins ARE toxic, like the pathogenic spike proteins, they can cause problems like tissue damage all by themselves without your immune system even being involved at that point.
But your adaptive immune system has done its job & you've made your serum antibodies by now! Yippee!
Too bad those (non-neutralizing, leaky) serum antibodies can only REACT to a (SARS-CoV-2) infection...it is biologically impossible for serum antibodies (in the blood) to PREVENT respiratory infections that enter the body through the mucosa of the mouth/throat, nose, & eyes.
To PREVENT respiratory infections requires a strong innate immune system with mucosal immunity and secretory IgA to stop the respiratory infection at the mucosal and epithelial barriers (stopping the infection OUTSIDE your body and PREVENTING the infection from getting INSIDE your body).
And this is also where the CTLs are supposed to do their cell-destroying activities. When epithelial cells in the mouth/throat, nose, & eyes are infected (like can happen with respiratory diseases) the Killer T-cells will kill those infected cells.
Epithelial cells at the epithelial barrier can be quickly replaced, usually in just a few days in most people. But injections bypass your body's natural protections and send their payload into your body, where that payload can enter your lymph system and bloodstream.
And in the case of the modified mRNA-LNP gene "therapy" injections, this can be disastrous, starting with the immune system attack response against transfected cells of tissues & organs (INSIDE your body) that are now making foreign non-self proteins.
Replacing cells from now damaged tissues and organs inside your body is a complex process that can take weeks or longer, with some areas unable to be repaired at all.
The modification of natural mRNA with synthetic n1-methyl pseudouridine made the modified mRNA longer lasting and resistant to the body’s natural breakdown processes. A Nobel Prize was awarded specifically for this use of longer lasting pseudouridine in the COVID modified mRNA injections.
The synthetic pseudouridine modified mRNA is causing a +1 ribosomal frameshift, as well as a reverse reading, so some people may make spike proteins AND mystery (or junk) non-self proteins.
Studies have found that an antibody subclass switch to IgG4 can occur between mRNA shot #2 & #3, which is sending a stand-down signal to the immune system, essentially telling the immune system to tolerate and ignore the (toxic pathogenic) spike proteins instead of actively fighting to clear the spike from the body.
And people who are getting "booster" after "booster" are repeatedly triggering these immune system activities and causing persistent systemic inflammation, which can cause hyper-immune and autoimmune responses...and then possible immune system exhaustion as your immune system becomes overwhelmed.
Pathology reports, including from autopsies, have revealed & confirmed the Killer T Lymphocyte infiltration & destruction of cells, oftentimes in vital organs.
And then there's the plasmid DNA contamination (with the oncogenic SV-40 promotor sequence) that's been discovered. There are a number of ways in which integration into the human genome is possible...
And more...
I am not a doctor…so PLEASE let me know of any corrections that need to be made if I have misstated something…
But tragically, I think the injuries, disabilities, and deaths from these modified mRNA-LNP gene “therapy” injections prove that the COVID shots have been an IMMUNOLOGICAL CATASTROPHE.
Footnote:
Credit to Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Dr. Mike Yeadon, Dr. Kevin Stillwagon, & Dr. Ryan Cole for their videos & articles from which I furthered my understanding of human immunology and the essential component of Self vs. Non-self.
Portions of my 2 comments relied on my notes from their work, as well as other doctors' and scientists' work from my over 10,000 hours researching all things "COVID" and the modified mRNA-LNP gene "therapy" injections since 2020. But as I am not a professional researcher, either, I am sorry to say that I neglected to keep proper citations.
I have not watched the whole interview, and I will not defend most of what the Biden admin did on COVID and vaccine policies.
Most definitely not the various mandates, all of which were indefensible.
But re: the headline here:
I am very glad they pressured the FDA to make the vaccine available sooner rather than later.
That was a GOOD thing, not a bad one.
So that it became available for the very old and those with multiple comorbidities sooner rather than later.
Which not only helped save their lives, but the AVAILABILITY of the vaccines enabled getting rid of so many government-imposed lockdown policies relatively sooner than relatively later.
Even if you are correct that “The Biden admin pressured the FDA to accelerate the review because they wanted to impose mandates for the military.” Their motivations for the speedup are not what I care about most; I care about the policy outcome.
I of course vociferously disagreed with all the mandates, the ones on the military.
Re: you claim that “That is not how science ought to function”, we are talking about public policy during a pandemic. So many of those things were not how society or government should function.
I have no doubt I’d agree with you on most other aspects here. And I’d surely agree known side effects should have been revealed.
But speeding up the availability of vaccines, however, was definitely net a good thing.
He makes it sound like just another day in the office...like this was a "normal" vaccine and not MRNA based gene therapy. Was his department even qualified to review this novel "treatment"?
Thank you for this. We all remain, however, behind the crushing CEPI-Gavi military ball of mRNA countermeasure platforms in the name of driving global innovation in biodefense and now (with actions across the political divides) with massive commitments to ‘AI’ backed vaccination programs in the name of pandemic preparedness.
Little has changed EXCEPT the US State Dept and NSC is now putting the world on an emergency footing without diplomatic or humane guidelines. AI uses the flood of pro-vaccine articles (devoid of science) to automate ignorance at all levels. The programs are neither safe or effective. We can now see that it was a distraction to pull out of the WHO while leaving the public- private-🇺🇸military/intel agencies in charge of an extrajudicial injection program. Bombing Yemen, destroying Gaza and Ukrainian targets are terrible yet only the deadly appetizer. Onerous tariffs on imports is going to starve US while Pandemic profiteers, unelected autocrats and technocrats of all kinds ally in global domination, destroying our middle class and anyone but oligarchs outside our borders.
Your findings are good to know! What do we do to put this in meaningful context. Trump Admin 1 and now 2 are going to hurt us and put us at war against one another, and others in ways many of us will not survive. RFK Jr hasn’t stopped the unelected globalists any more than MAGA Republicans or Democrats. Peace and health be with us.💝
Everything changes with Marty Makary and RFK Jr. Totally different playing field, rules and leaders. New direction, new leadership.
Thank you!
Most people are unaware of the difference between “authorization” and “approval”, and with our government and media shoving the shots down our throats it didn’t matter. Oh yes and the mandates..
I am curious where the data came from for the approval decision. Obviously not from VAERS. Also there is no medical code for vaccine injury. So if people are coming into hospital claiming adverse reaction from the shots unless it is reported to VAERS I’m assuming there’s no reference point. So where’s the data coming from?
Why does the analysis from the initially withheld safety data procured from FDA via lawsuit show little efficacy? And this gentleman feels the shots were the miracle worker? Not talking about the booster.
Was the review team aware of the change in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer shot prior to mass rollout?
Not impressed with his stance about young adults getting the shots and his myocarditis viewpoint.
The CDC knew in March 2021 about breakthrough infections and lack of disease protection.
It’s shocking that a product than offers 30% protection is considered “acceptable”. Yes, they raised the bar to 50% but still. Yet the public was lied to outright. Old news.
No the mandates did not cause people to dig in their heels. Their decision had been made early on. I’m sick of that blame game. And no that’s not what caused Covid to spread. That is a leaky “vaccine” so please stop already.
Thank goodness Dr. Jay is now head of NIH!!
I actually listened to the whole show. In light of Peter Marks recent resignation or “being forced out” as the media says it, this podcast was enlightening to some degree.
Why is the data on vaccines at FDA proprietary IF the FDA is meant to protect and represent the American people. We don’t care about competition…we care about safety and efficacy. “Worth developing a vaccine” means FDA protects this information so competitors cannot emerge…how many better vaccines could get developed if this data was disclosed? ESPECIALLY in the case of a pandemic emergency! What the FDA is essentially doing is protecting the business interests of those pushing for mRNA approval (that is the promise the agency makes and inadvertently promotes these to enter the market). In all fairness there is really no way around this. This in some cases might be more egregious than recommending who should get it. In a pure scientific sense this will always be a conflict of interest that we might call “commercialized” science.
But from the start the shots were meant as protective not as neutralizing immunization. There was first an emphasis that it was protective for all and then the narrative shifted to protect against severe disease. But its original design was to protect against severe disease, NOT to truly immunize and protect against infection. Was the measurement confused that immunization against infection was the RCT, when in fact it was protection against severe disease. This was not clarified very well in the discussion. It is this detail that destroyed confidence in the system…because the mandate for all had to actually imply it was protective against infection, not severe disease and hospitalization. How efficacy was measured seemed mixed up by the people at the top?Many got shots and were infected…
What actually was the impetus for mandates? Above all it is this question that eroded public confidence in public health the most. Even the inserts that came with the shots said in print that the product should not have been coerced and should be taken from free will.
There was mention of lack of manufacturing data…this would be critical for completely new style of vaccine that requires the full intact mRNA to be stable and encapsulated in LNPs in vials that were stored frozen or cold chain?
Even to this day the biological mechanisms are unclear. New recent Akiko Iwasaki work comes to mind. How hard is it to have transparent info on manufacturing lots, full length in vitro transcription results, presence of remaining template plasmid DNA (how was it decided what level this should be?) and tracking the presence of full or partial spike protein after shots…in the peripheral blood as well as antibodies against it over time. Would love to hear more discussion on safety biology, not on efficacy. There is overemphasis on efficacy, not enough on safety (myocarditis was a minor part of the discussion).
An FDA review would only be as good as the data presented…which in some ways was a conflict of interest during that time: two companies being advocated, rushing data to review, how could the data have been top notch, when literally mRNA and it’s technology en masse had never been evaluated. Even “normal style” vaccines take considerable time and effort for full approval. Many vaccine creators openly were vocal about this and were censored. Including some who had attempted vaccination against sars1.
Why was only spike the main antigenic target…another mystery.
So based on Krause’s statement of having the data in front of them they DID make the best decision at the time, but the outcomes, goals, and pressure from the outside kept morphing. In all fairness it must have been difficult. But an FDA review needs more transparency: what about how data is produced? Absolute versus relative risk evaluation? Were the trial participants a good representation of the general population or just the vulnerable pop considering its true purpose was to prevent severe disease and hospitalization? Even 4y later so many things sound unclear. One thing was clear: the messaging was “commitment to science” but if this were true why was rigorous review overruled by the top down? This is the exact opposite of commitment to good science, debate, and safety.
The irony of the dialogue that FDA doesn’t recommend who should take shots and then the podcast ends with the former FDA regulator saying “FDA shouldn’t recommend” is then recommending a healthy 20yo college soccer player should take it based on risk benefit. Without any transparency about what this published risk/benefit is. I would wholeheartedly side with Rav on this one. I also think more rigorous study is needed on the claim that shots somehow lessened the myocarditis that would otherwise have happened without it…there is so much more nuance to this including those coerced to take the shot after being infected. Krause rightfully called this nonsense…so again the “blanket coverage” approach Rav mentions was just plain wrong.
One more nuance here is the risk benefit ratio is actually a marketing point for a product. If it was high and compelling (even without long term studies) it seems strange that ultimately it was mandated. There is always this question of who is protecting who with shots…but it always needs to be a decision of “I read the label and I decided yes or no to use this product to protect myself.”
Great discussion…while there was advocacy for more to be employed at FDA…perhaps there should just be more rigorous review to start…how many of these treatments coming in even deserve review to begin with? Generally though it seems like regulation would need to increase if increased confidence in public health and support for FDA will be restored?
..."The FDA's role is crucial for public health and safety."...there is no such thing as public safety. The only role of the FDA is to approve big pharma drugs no matter how deadly they are.
Witness mRNA poisons which no one in the FDA will ever admit that they are murder drugs. So much for stupid public safety. All I have control over is my safety...at least as far as making decisions about taking vaccines and drugs. I couldn't care less about anything the FDA, CDC or HHS says.
Crixcyon so true. It all boils down to your decision. The question was whether we were properly informed. In a clinical trial (including the ones that would have been conducted or EUA), consent is foremost for participation. Why then did consent evaporate if we hold it sacred in the “scientific process” but it no longer matters in the “real world?” In my biomedical ethics training the number one warning for clinical work is coercion without consent. If we are committed to a scientifically-ethically-centered world why would consent no longer matter.
Thank you to all the brave doctors & scientists and all the people of the world with curiosity, integrity, and strength of character who have risked so much to get this info out into the world.
The mRNA shots were/are always going to be an immunological catastrophe for humanity.
The mechanism of action (using mRNA instructions to turn one’s own cells into foreign non-self “spike protein factories”) is the primary mechanism of harm.
The primary danger of the COVID-19 mRNA injections has always been one’s own immune system’s attack response by the mighty CD8+ Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte cells (AKA Killer T-cells):
The COVID-19 mRNA injections must be recalled from the market and mRNA-based products must be banned because the modified mRNA-LNP genetic technology platform is fundamentally flawed & dangerous by design.
These modified mRNA-LNP COVID-19 injections, that trigger one's own immune system to attack & kill one's own formerly healthy cells (that have been instructed to produce/express foreign, non-self proteins), no matter where those cells are in the body, never should have been made available to the public in the first place.
When the (designed to be long-lasting) n1-methyl pseudouridine modified mRNA transfects one's cells, and gives instructions for the ribosomes to make & express foreign non-self proteins (such as the toxic SARS-CoV-2 spike protein), one's immune system sends the CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) to kill those formerly healthy cells that are now making & expressing non-self proteins.
It is the mission of these CD8+ CTLs to seek out and destroy any such transfected cell that is making foreign non-self proteins. That’s what they do…
Due to the biodistribution properties of the lipid nanoparticles, the encased modified mRNA can go anywhere in the body, including crossing the blood-brain and placental barriers...The LNP "delivery vehicles" traveled to different parts of the body in different people.
Expressing any foreign protein is fatal to the cell doing the expressing. The reason is, our bodies are protected by being able to distinguish ourselves from things that shouldn't be there. Anything non-self will trigger immune destruction of the cells & tissues involved.
Some people will express lots of foreign proteins in vulnerable locations. Others express less in less vulnerable areas.
The location of expression defines the adverse event: if you get foreign protein expression in your heart cells, you could get myocarditis & experience cardiac arrest; if the expression is in your brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nervous system, you could get one or more of a variety of neurological conditions; if in your eye, possible blindness; if in your ovaries, possible infertility; if in the placenta, possible miscarriage, stillbirth, or birth defects; if in the endothelial cells that line your blood vessels, possible vascular &/or microvascular injuries like clots/microclots or the long white fibrous clots, leading to strokes, heart attacks, or pulmonary embolisms…
If the expression of foreign proteins is in your own immune cells, you could experience immune dysfunction, dysregulation, & suppression including repeated infections, immune tolerance of a pathogenic foreign protein due to antibody subclass switch to IgG4 & increased IgG4-related diseases, T cell exhaustion, interference with & suppression of innate immunity, persistent systemic inflammation, dysregulation of toll-like receptors and reduced cancer surveillance or the suppression of tumor-suppressing immune system activities & cell-signaling (increasing your risk of fast-growing and aggressive cancers)…
And more…
There's no limit to the horrible consequences of injecting into your body something that triggers your own immune system to attack & kill your own formerly healthy cells & tissues.
The public “health” agencies, the COVID “authorities”, & the “mainstream” media fraudulently marketed these experimental mRNA gene “therapy” products as “safe & effective vaccines”. Trusting people thought that they were being presented with the choice (or the mandate) as to whether or not to take a “safe & effective vaccine”…But that was/is a deceptively false “choice”…
The COVID-19 mRNA injections are NOT safe, they are NOT effective, and they are NOT vaccines.
These modified mRNA-LNP gene “therapy” injections never would have passed proper safety studies required for gene therapy products. Safety studies (including biodistribution, immunogenicity, immunotoxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, shedding, long-term effects, & more) that were bypassed because of the fraudulent mislabeling as “vaccines”. (And because of the EUA & “countermeasure” designations under the Project BioShield Act & PREP Act).
NO ONE should have ever had the “choice” of taking these gene “therapy” injections because the modified mRNA-LNP genetic technology platform is fundamentally flawed & dangerous by design.
The danger is NOT limited to just getting more COVID “boosters”. ANY mRNA gene “therapy” product that transfects your cells and instructs those cells to produce foreign non-self proteins (ANY non-self protein) will trigger an immune system attack response against your own cells & tissues (the role of the Killer T-cells is to monitor ALL the cells of the body, ready to destroy/kill any that express foreign, non-self proteins). This makes EVERY mRNA-based injected product harmful by design.
No one who took these modified mRNA-LNP COVID injections made an informed decision. Most people had no clue about what they allowed to be injected into their bodies...
Also most people still do not understand that the devastating harms inflicted upon people over the last few years was intentional:
https://rumble.com/v6qcb0y-dr.-david-martin-mar-06-2025-edmonton-alberta-replay.html
Part 2
AFTER the mighty CD8+ Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte cells (AKA Killer T-cells) attack response to modified mRNA transfected cells of tissues & organs inside your body:
After the primary immune system attack response by the cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), resulting in varying degrees of tissue damage & pathology in different people, a lot happens...
The CTLs will not be able to kill every cell making non-self (spike) protein, so some amount of foreign (spike) protein will get made & released from your cells. That amount will also vary from person to person.
Specialized cells called antigen-presenting cells, especially dendritic cells and macrophages, spring into action. Long story short…you will get serum antibodies made against those foreign proteins which is the stated goal of any shot called a vaccine.
But that can take up to 2 weeks, and during that time, the foreign non-self (spike) proteins are biologically active and will attach to various cellular receptors, resulting in a whole new level of possible tissue destruction.
Now your immune system will activate macrophages & neutrophils that will kill THOSE cells through inflammatory pathways, regardless of whether or not the non-self proteins are toxic themselves.
And if the non-self proteins ARE toxic, like the pathogenic spike proteins, they can cause problems like tissue damage all by themselves without your immune system even being involved at that point.
But your adaptive immune system has done its job & you've made your serum antibodies by now! Yippee!
Too bad those (non-neutralizing, leaky) serum antibodies can only REACT to a (SARS-CoV-2) infection...it is biologically impossible for serum antibodies (in the blood) to PREVENT respiratory infections that enter the body through the mucosa of the mouth/throat, nose, & eyes.
To PREVENT respiratory infections requires a strong innate immune system with mucosal immunity and secretory IgA to stop the respiratory infection at the mucosal and epithelial barriers (stopping the infection OUTSIDE your body and PREVENTING the infection from getting INSIDE your body).
And this is also where the CTLs are supposed to do their cell-destroying activities. When epithelial cells in the mouth/throat, nose, & eyes are infected (like can happen with respiratory diseases) the Killer T-cells will kill those infected cells.
Epithelial cells at the epithelial barrier can be quickly replaced, usually in just a few days in most people. But injections bypass your body's natural protections and send their payload into your body, where that payload can enter your lymph system and bloodstream.
And in the case of the modified mRNA-LNP gene "therapy" injections, this can be disastrous, starting with the immune system attack response against transfected cells of tissues & organs (INSIDE your body) that are now making foreign non-self proteins.
Replacing cells from now damaged tissues and organs inside your body is a complex process that can take weeks or longer, with some areas unable to be repaired at all.
The modification of natural mRNA with synthetic n1-methyl pseudouridine made the modified mRNA longer lasting and resistant to the body’s natural breakdown processes. A Nobel Prize was awarded specifically for this use of longer lasting pseudouridine in the COVID modified mRNA injections.
The synthetic pseudouridine modified mRNA is causing a +1 ribosomal frameshift, as well as a reverse reading, so some people may make spike proteins AND mystery (or junk) non-self proteins.
Studies have found that an antibody subclass switch to IgG4 can occur between mRNA shot #2 & #3, which is sending a stand-down signal to the immune system, essentially telling the immune system to tolerate and ignore the (toxic pathogenic) spike proteins instead of actively fighting to clear the spike from the body.
And people who are getting "booster" after "booster" are repeatedly triggering these immune system activities and causing persistent systemic inflammation, which can cause hyper-immune and autoimmune responses...and then possible immune system exhaustion as your immune system becomes overwhelmed.
Pathology reports, including from autopsies, have revealed & confirmed the Killer T Lymphocyte infiltration & destruction of cells, oftentimes in vital organs.
And then there's the plasmid DNA contamination (with the oncogenic SV-40 promotor sequence) that's been discovered. There are a number of ways in which integration into the human genome is possible...
And more...
I am not a doctor…so PLEASE let me know of any corrections that need to be made if I have misstated something…
But tragically, I think the injuries, disabilities, and deaths from these modified mRNA-LNP gene “therapy” injections prove that the COVID shots have been an IMMUNOLOGICAL CATASTROPHE.
Footnote:
Credit to Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Dr. Mike Yeadon, Dr. Kevin Stillwagon, & Dr. Ryan Cole for their videos & articles from which I furthered my understanding of human immunology and the essential component of Self vs. Non-self.
Portions of my 2 comments relied on my notes from their work, as well as other doctors' and scientists' work from my over 10,000 hours researching all things "COVID" and the modified mRNA-LNP gene "therapy" injections since 2020. But as I am not a professional researcher, either, I am sorry to say that I neglected to keep proper citations.
I listened for the first 30-45 minutes. I heard nothing new except—the role of the CDC vs the role of the FDA were differentiated. Thanks.
But please understand that this sounds like finger pointing instead of real information.
To Americans this doesn’t address the loss of confidence in our public health “system/s”.
Where’s the meat?
I have not watched the whole interview, and I will not defend most of what the Biden admin did on COVID and vaccine policies.
Most definitely not the various mandates, all of which were indefensible.
But re: the headline here:
I am very glad they pressured the FDA to make the vaccine available sooner rather than later.
That was a GOOD thing, not a bad one.
So that it became available for the very old and those with multiple comorbidities sooner rather than later.
Which not only helped save their lives, but the AVAILABILITY of the vaccines enabled getting rid of so many government-imposed lockdown policies relatively sooner than relatively later.
Even if you are correct that “The Biden admin pressured the FDA to accelerate the review because they wanted to impose mandates for the military.” Their motivations for the speedup are not what I care about most; I care about the policy outcome.
I of course vociferously disagreed with all the mandates, the ones on the military.
Re: you claim that “That is not how science ought to function”, we are talking about public policy during a pandemic. So many of those things were not how society or government should function.
I have no doubt I’d agree with you on most other aspects here. And I’d surely agree known side effects should have been revealed.
But speeding up the availability of vaccines, however, was definitely net a good thing.
He makes it sound like just another day in the office...like this was a "normal" vaccine and not MRNA based gene therapy. Was his department even qualified to review this novel "treatment"?
Thank you for this. We all remain, however, behind the crushing CEPI-Gavi military ball of mRNA countermeasure platforms in the name of driving global innovation in biodefense and now (with actions across the political divides) with massive commitments to ‘AI’ backed vaccination programs in the name of pandemic preparedness.
Little has changed EXCEPT the US State Dept and NSC is now putting the world on an emergency footing without diplomatic or humane guidelines. AI uses the flood of pro-vaccine articles (devoid of science) to automate ignorance at all levels. The programs are neither safe or effective. We can now see that it was a distraction to pull out of the WHO while leaving the public- private-🇺🇸military/intel agencies in charge of an extrajudicial injection program. Bombing Yemen, destroying Gaza and Ukrainian targets are terrible yet only the deadly appetizer. Onerous tariffs on imports is going to starve US while Pandemic profiteers, unelected autocrats and technocrats of all kinds ally in global domination, destroying our middle class and anyone but oligarchs outside our borders.
Your findings are good to know! What do we do to put this in meaningful context. Trump Admin 1 and now 2 are going to hurt us and put us at war against one another, and others in ways many of us will not survive. RFK Jr hasn’t stopped the unelected globalists any more than MAGA Republicans or Democrats. Peace and health be with us.💝