What's wrong with the article is its overall positive, hopeful tone alongside names of one or more individuals the media outlet has committed to publishing nothing but negative doom and gloom about. Such commitments are typically made spontaneously via emotionally charged midnight memos to apply across the board without exception. If thi…
What's wrong with the article is its overall positive, hopeful tone alongside names of one or more individuals the media outlet has committed to publishing nothing but negative doom and gloom about. Such commitments are typically made spontaneously via emotionally charged midnight memos to apply across the board without exception. If this particular media outlet has ever published anything vaguely positive about Trump or any of his appointees, I would be utterly surprised...unless of course one of those midnight memos was issued right before your submission.
What's wrong with the article is its overall positive, hopeful tone alongside names of one or more individuals the media outlet has committed to publishing nothing but negative doom and gloom about. Such commitments are typically made spontaneously via emotionally charged midnight memos to apply across the board without exception. If this particular media outlet has ever published anything vaguely positive about Trump or any of his appointees, I would be utterly surprised...unless of course one of those midnight memos was issued right before your submission.