Explains (at least to me) why there was so much undo pressure to inject children. Their risk was almost nil, but their inclusion in wide data harvesting, would insure a much more “safe & effective” result... Angers me.. ie Use the kids to make the whole mess look better.
Explains (at least to me) why there was so much undo pressure to inject children. Their risk was almost nil, but their inclusion in wide data harvesting, would insure a much more “safe & effective” result... Angers me.. ie Use the kids to make the whole mess look better.
Yes, and needless to say, there are so many reasons NOT to risk the vaccine in kids and younger folks, EVEN IF the 6-month mortality effect is mildly favorable for them, considering that it's ALREADY unfavorable for the older folks by 6 months. It's entirely expected that any vulnerabilities of older folks will manifest much, much sooner (especially when the outcome is MORTALITY) than any potential vulnerabilities of younger folks.
Explains (at least to me) why there was so much undo pressure to inject children. Their risk was almost nil, but their inclusion in wide data harvesting, would insure a much more “safe & effective” result... Angers me.. ie Use the kids to make the whole mess look better.
Yes, and needless to say, there are so many reasons NOT to risk the vaccine in kids and younger folks, EVEN IF the 6-month mortality effect is mildly favorable for them, considering that it's ALREADY unfavorable for the older folks by 6 months. It's entirely expected that any vulnerabilities of older folks will manifest much, much sooner (especially when the outcome is MORTALITY) than any potential vulnerabilities of younger folks.