Why So Many Gen Zers Identify as LGBTQ+ — And Why the Numbers Are Often Misread
Also, is sapiosexuality (being aroused by intelligence) a real thing?
In a recent episode of my podcast, I sat down with evolutionary psychologist Geoffrey Miller to unpack a statistic that regularly shocks people: surveys now show that 20–25% of Gen Z identifies as LGBTQ+.
At face value, this looks like a dramatic transformation in human sexuality. Some interpret it as evidence of mass social contagion or ideological indoctrination. Others celebrate it as long-suppressed identities finally finding expression. But as Miller explains, both reactions tend to misunderstand what the data is actually capturing.
The crucial distinction is between sexual orientation and identity labels.
Studies show rates of exclusive same-sex attraction appear to be remarkably stable for decades. The percentage of people who are strictly homosexual — attracted only to their own sex — remains small and consistent across time. What has changed rapidly is how people describe themselves.
Much of the growth in LGBTQ identification comes from:
Rising identification as bisexual, particularly among women
Broad, non-specific labels like “queer”
Newly popular subcategories that blur sexual orientation, personality traits, and cultural signaling
During the conversation, I jokingly said that at the current rate, pretty soon all of us will be LGBTQ+ — because every year there seems to be a new category added to the “plus.” I said I might as well see everyone at the next Pride parade, since I’m attracted to intelligent women and emotional connection — which, apparently, now makes me sapiosexual or demisexual.
As Miller notes, terms like sapiosexual (attraction to intelligence) or demisexual (attraction that depends on emotional connection) describe preferences that have existed across cultures for thousands of years. Framing them as distinct sexual identities doesn’t uncover something new about human biology — it reframes familiar mate preferences in the language of identity politics.
In fact, Miller’s own research shows that attraction to intelligence and competence is a near-universal human trait, especially in long-term partner selection. In that sense, if sapiosexual counts as a sexual identity, then most of humanity qualifies.
This helps explain why labels like queer have become so expansive. For many Gen Zers, “queer” doesn’t describe a specific pattern of attraction at all. It often functions as a cultural, aesthetic, or political identity, rather than a precise account of sexual behavior.
What looks like a radical shift in human orientation is, in large part, a shift in language, norms, and self-understanding — shaped by social media, politics, and an ever-expanding vocabulary for describing the self.
This clip explores why that distinction matters.
Click HERE to watch the full clip
Support The Illusion of Consensus!
The Illusion of Consensus is a fully reader-supported publication. If you support the high-quality science and wellness journalism on this site, consider becoming a paid or founding member to receive exclusive articles, early-access episodes, and ask questions for future episodes. Or support The Illusion of Consensus with a one-time donation.
 | A guest post by
|
Also, indoctrination since kindergarten doesn't help.... I work in a school and there are rainbows everywhere and A LOT of the library books are now about this.... especially the books on display.... it's actually sickening..... and FOMO... that is a real thing, too.....
Its a fad plain and simple. We can debate why its a fad but that's what it boils down to and every generation has gone thru fads often unique to that generation and sometimes shared by the adjoining generation. What's unique here is this fad requires one to disbelieve in reality and chose their own make believe universe. The other key difference is that this Fad is getting public and private sector support and funding and that should be the biggest of Red Flags. In the 80's GenX'ers went thru several fads like stone washed jeans and Rap music (which was still new to the music scene) along with the Hip-Hop culture that accompanied it. You had many white teens acting as if they were black. The only external support for these came from those private sector entities that directly benefitted from the fad such as the music industry and Jeans manufacturers. There was no public or legislative support for these at any level but there is for the gender ideology and that is the Red Flag we all show be aware of.