10 Comments
User's avatar
pimaCanyon's avatar

Questions for Dr Malone:

1) Did Dr Malone really say that anti-vaxxers are the most gullible people in the world?

2) Has Dr Malone reviewed the science on vaccines, including every study that's compared vaccinated children with unvaccinated and the conclusion was always that the unvaccinated children are healthier?

3) What does Dr Malone make of the fact that most SIDS deaths occur on the day of or soon after the "well baby visit" where the infant is jabbed with several vaccines?

4) What does he make of the fact that many well and normal children become autistic immediately after getting vaccinated?

5) Why are we continuing to vaccinate for diseases that are now treatable with antibiotics and other therapeutics?

Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

How do we create oversight for medical research that goes beyond the boundaries of good common sense?

Colleen's avatar

Why did he create this when it can be used for evil? Why mess with what God created? There are natural cures to everything! God isn't stupid!

Deadcat99's avatar

What can RFKjr reasonably accomplish in the next two years

The Scam Doctor's avatar

Maybe he can start by learning how to read a scientific study. Here's proof he cannot:

https://thescamdoctor.substack.com/p/how-to-cherry-pick-data-to-scam-people?r=6hgshq

Judy Dobson's avatar

Who is in control? Globalists????

The Scam Doctor's avatar

Is Robert Malone able to tell you how many vaccines were recommended on the schedule prior to this most recent change? Here's the real number (not counting COVID vaccines) for you to fact check him with:

https://thescamdoctor.substack.com/p/no-child-has-ever-received-72-vaccines?r=6hgshq

Laura's avatar

Recently, medical news sites have been bemoaning the increased risks of litigation for doctors treating "pregnant patients" (the term that has been dictated to be used these days). The scuttlebutt is that doctors refuse to see "pregnant patients" and refer them out, causing delays in care, because they are afraid of their liability due to the Dobbs decision. So much of patient treatment is related to liability and protocols these days. This affects vaccine rules for doctors, too. Can he elucidate the nature of the system requiring doctors to follow the rules to explain why doctors are so hesitant to make individualized decisions? The lack of an actual direct doctor-patient relationship in these modern times is part of the problem in care as medical establishments focus more on liability issues than patient care sometimes. And I believe that certain industries (not just pharma, but also the abortion industry) like to up the ante on the fear quotient of doctors in order to protect their industries. Dr. Malone may want to avoid the abortion arena like the plague because of the emotional nature of it in his discussion with you, but he may wish to discuss the whole liability and doctor behavior structure with you in your interview to enhance the understanding of lay people about the structure of the medical system, particularly as it applies to employed doctors and how they interact with patients.

Laura's avatar

What does Dr. Malone think about the potential for mRNA technology for individualized cancer treatment, e.g.https://www.merck.com/news/merck-and-moderna-announce-phase-3-interpath-001-trial-of-intismeran-autogene-plus-keytruda-met-endpoints-of-recurrence-free-survival-rfs-and-distant-metastasis-free-survival-dmfs-in-patient/ as contrasted with blanket mRNA vaccines given out indiscriminately?

Julie Janczyk's avatar

Why did You originally develop the mRNA process?