The Illusion of Consensus

The Illusion of Consensus

Share this post

The Illusion of Consensus
The Illusion of Consensus
Breaking News: Court Prohibits Biden Admin, CDC, And FBI From Coercing Online Platforms To Censor Content
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Breaking News: Court Prohibits Biden Admin, CDC, And FBI From Coercing Online Platforms To Censor Content

Full highlights below.

Rav Arora's avatar
Rav Arora
Sep 09, 2023
∙ Paid
109

Share this post

The Illusion of Consensus
The Illusion of Consensus
Breaking News: Court Prohibits Biden Admin, CDC, And FBI From Coercing Online Platforms To Censor Content
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
7
5
Share
What's happening to arts censorship in the age of cancel culture? | ArtsHub  Australia

Hi everyone,

The Fifth Circuit Court’s ruling in the Missouri v. Biden case just released last night and I went ahead and read every page (what else to do on a Friday night? - Going on a fun JRE podcast binge now though!).

The court’s decision is technically mixed — as they vacated most injunctions and reversed the censorship prohibition on some groups (CISA, NIAD, and Department of State) — but the outcome is ultimately good: the court upheld the key injunction in the case which prohibits the Biden administration, CDC, FBI, and Surgeon General from "coerc[ing] or significantly encourag[ing] a platform’s content-moderation decisions."

So you don’t have to read all 74 pages, I highlighted the most critical passages below. Stay tuned for more coverage, including a piece I wrote in Matt Taibbi’s Racket News!

If you appreciate my efficient, fully independent journalism, please consider supporting me by becoming a paid subscriber:

Highlights:

The White House did indeed coerce social media companies to moderate content:

We find that the White House, acting in concert with the Surgeon General’s office, likely (1) coerced the platforms to make their moderation decisions by way of intimidating messages and threats of adverse consequences, and (2) significantly encouraged the platforms’ decisions by commandeering their decision-making processes, both in violation of the First Amendment.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Rav Arora
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More