20 Comments
User's avatar
Kathy's avatar

This article might make Alex Berenson‘s head explode, but thank you for sharing this information. I have a dear friend who has suffered from suicidal depression for over 40 years, he has tried every kind of therapy, every kind of drug, and even shock treatment. Nothing has worked. he suffers from PTSD caused by regular beatings by his father and his older brother the last one occurring when he was 20 years old! I have a long hoped that he could gain access to some of these programs using the psychedelics. I am also glad that you discussed the serotonin receptor destroying properties of SSRI. I heard this on the Gary Null show decades ago. I remember him saying that when they were about to approve Prozac, a whistleblower came forward and tried to warn that the serotonin receptors in the animals brains had been destroyed. Obviously, his warnings were buried, and the drug quickly became one of the highest earning drugs ever.

Expand full comment
Rav Arora's avatar

Thank you for sharing, Kathy. I hope Alex's brain doesn't explode! I hope he sees this and agrees with my assessment. MDMA therapy is a potentially life-saving treatment for PTSD. There's a clinic in Vancouver that could guide you in the right direction if your dear friend can travel there. If not, the future still looks bright as MDMA will likely be FDA-approved next year.

Expand full comment
Clarence Wilhelm Spangle's avatar

In what the late Saddam Hussein once dubbed “the great Satan,” roughly two-thirds of the United States enlisted military corps is white . . . The fat, bulbous U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin once confirmed in a 93-2 vote of the U.S. Senate, immediately embarked on a whirlwind media tour of duty, telling the pseudo-secular sycophants in the state-controlled tabloid press and state-controlled television talk show circuit about how the U.S. Army is full of bad racist white men.

Senior Defense Department leaders celebrating yet another Pride Month at the Pentagon sounding the alarm about the rising number of state laws they say target the LGBTQ+ community, warned the trend is hurting the feelings of the armed forces . . . “LGBTQ plus and other diverse communities are under attack, just because they are different. Hate for hate’s sake,” said Gil Cisneros, the Pentagon’s undersecretary for personnel and readiness, who also serves as DoD’s chief diversity and inclusion officer.

And now the U.S. Army is doing ads begging for more young white males? What happened?

Even with a full-on declaration of war from Congress, and even if Gavin Newsome could be cheated into the Oval Office by ZOG somehow, with Globohomo diversity brigades going door-to-door looking to impress American children into military service, they will be met with armed, well-trained opposition, the invasion at the Southern border is going full tilt, and the drugs are flowing in like never before.

Get ready for it . . . the fat old devil worshipping fags on Capitol Hill, on Wall Street, in Whitehall, and in Brussels are in no shape to fight a war themselves, and most Americans are armed to the teeth with their own guns . . . NATO hates heterosexual white men . . . they said so themselves . . .

https://cwspangle.substack.com/i/138320669/nato-an-anti-white-and-anti-family-institution

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 9, 2024
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Sharon Beautiful Evening's avatar

The truth bites and I am grandmother of a straight while male - I pray for him and ALL young people to be following the "narrow path" that Jesus showed to all who will belive on Him!

Expand full comment
MakerOfNoise's avatar

I know someone that did MDMA therapy. They said that it fundamentally changed their relationship with their spouse and children for the better.

Expand full comment
Kathy's avatar

Do you know the name of the clinic in Vancouver? Thank you

Expand full comment
Rav Arora's avatar

Thrive Downtown in Vancouver. Lead clinical director Carson: carson.kivari@gmail.com

Expand full comment
Freedom Fox's avatar

The very first time I poked my head into a medical library to read up on medical research and studies was in 1987, immediately after the 1986 decision to place MDMA on Schedule 1. It didn't make sense to anyone who had familiarity with the drug, its effects, its lack of psychoaddictive or physiological addictive properties - just the opposite, too frequent use produced little to no effect for the user. Which made it a poor candidate for dosing at the high levels the studies on neurotoxicity signals relied on.

In fact, at the time, the studies cited by regulators weren't even of MDMA (or MMDA, there were two different drugs known as "ecstasy" in circulation with different effects the chemical sequences produced). The existing studies at the time were of MDA, described as a close cousin of MDMA/MMDA, known as "Eve" on the street, studied and used most widely in the 1960's. Johns Hopkins studies I remember reading, cited in the initial JAMA and NEJM articles about the 1986 rescheduling, that I found in the medical library on campus.

Those studies were of copious amounts of MDA given to rats in doses equivalent to three to seven doses a day, for seven days a week, over the course of four to six months. A ludicrous amount of the drug that nobody, but nobody would or ever could do. And giving that much of any substance to anyone will produce adverse effects. Try taking three sugar cubes a day for seven days a week over the course of four to six months, see how your body is doing after!

It was as a result of my curiosity that I did my own research examining the sources relied upon by public policymakers that I learned what a farce medical science is, the farce that public policy relying upon farcical medical science is, and how public policymakers will cherry-pick and misuse science to justify their desired public policy rules and laws. Just like what's happened with covid. And most all of the other scientific lies, like man-caused climate change, trans-insanity and the cornucopia of freedom and liberty-ending rules and laws based in similarly absurd "science."

Research. To those not named Rav Arora or Jay Battacharya I encourage you to try doing it. It's not that hard. A non-scientist can just as easily access the source studies and spot the absurdities and flaws found in them that I found in 1987 existed with the criminalization of MDMA. You have grey matter, too. Lots of it. No disrespect to Rav or Jay, but neither of them are any smarter than most of their readers.. They just take the time to research. Just like you can. If you're curious enough to. Or just "trust the experts" who do. And we know where that leads.

Expand full comment
STH's avatar

It would be nice if some billionaire somewhere started their own unbiased medical research teams and publishing journal. Sort of like Substack!

Expand full comment
John Visher's avatar

Miserable people are more easily controlled. The materialists want control.

Expand full comment
jody's avatar

Interesting and I cannot wait to read this article. I was just listening to Dr. Andrew Huberman speaking with a psychiatrist about ‘treatments for autism’ ( controversial phrase) and she said that MDMA is a hallucinogen and I thought… No it is not.

And he did not disagree with her or push back. Very peculiar.

Expand full comment
Loretta's avatar

I just realized, this is posted a year ago.

Expand full comment
Diana Barahona's avatar

On a personal note, I attended two underground "house parties" in L..A. in 2011, which turned out to be CIA mind-control experiments. Everyone took ecstasy, who could attend was strictly controlled by the organizers, and the music itself carried subliminal programming. So, house parties were perfect experiments in mind-control. If you want evidence, why did the Party for Socialism and Liberation come out in favor of the mRNA shots? The PSL was founded by two German-Americans, the Becker brothers: it is a mind-control operation, and so was every other organization in the U.S. -- from socialists to conservative Christians.

Expand full comment
Diana Barahona's avatar

The Luciferian Brotherhood -- the group that's really in charge -- had an interest in keeping both cannabis and, it appears, MDMA illegal, but not only to protect the profits of dangerous drugs provided by big pharma. Another motive is that the CIA (the assassins of the Luciferian Brotherhood) could make more money from selling illegal drugs. The CIA could also adulterate illegal drugs, which they couldn't do to legal drugs.

Additionally, the CIA was using cannabis farms in Northern California to lure migrant children to the area as trimmers, where the children disappeared underground to be used for adrenochrome harvesting.

So to restate my point, it isn't only that the Luciferians don't want people taking mind-altering substances that could be beneficial in order to keep people on detrimental drugs such as SSRIs-- although that is certainly a motive. Other factors to consider are the profits of illegal drugs, profits from human trafficking, and the ability to release any drug they wished and call it ecstasy.

Expand full comment
jacob silverman's avatar

"However, Dr. Fraiman stated the most striking finding of the study was deliberately obscured. “The finding of this study that we all thought was the most novel and unexpected is the adolescents were much more resistant to MDMA neurotoxicity than adults.” “This is counter to the general dogma of the fragility of the developing adolescent brain we commonly hear mentioned in reference to teen drug use,” added Fraiman. While they did accurately report the data, Fraiman revealed they “chose not to focus on this interesting and surprising finding as it goes against NIDA dogma.”"

The above strikes me as quite typical. What generally happens is, the researcher does a correct study. After all they are trained to do that. Then they ignore their findings.

Expand full comment
Dan's avatar

Jordan Peterson went on to say in that interview or talk that psychedelics can have some benefit in most people but there is a percentage to which it has nightmarish effects.

Expand full comment
Marie Flatley's avatar

It seems still to be about following the $$$. There’s a similar story with prescribing hormones for women during menopause. If university researchers and think tanks such as the Salk Institute untangle themselves from both pharma and the federal government, better therapies could happen sooner.

Expand full comment
Ferg ferguson's avatar

Maybe big Pharma sees another trillion 🤮🤮🤮industry....mdma for all! Especially for WH aids🤫

Expand full comment
Lon Guyland's avatar

Sadly postponing the reckoning with the reality that happiness won’t come from a pill. Have we learned nothing from disastrous decades of psychiatry?

Tragic.

Expand full comment
Kasandra's avatar

Your article is immensely useful, Rav. Hope you have a ko-fi or patreon page. It is not so feasible at the moment to financially subscribe to every channel we read. SSRIs side effects are huge and even doctors will sweep the side effects under the carpet. I appreciate your outstanding work. X

Expand full comment