10 Comments
User's avatar
Dr. K's avatar

I am going to start begging with each episode that you run these things through an autotranscriber so that those of us who are aurally impaired, visual learners, or who do not have 101 minutes to listen can not miss this important content. Autotranscribers are cheap/free and very good -- their errors are at about the same level as the audio experience.

Podcast creators lose half their potential audience believing that unless people will listen they should not be served. That is self-limiting and wrong. Please get this printed out (with whatever minor imperfections follow -- we can deal with it) so we can all learn.

Thank you.

Expand full comment
Peter Athanasius's avatar

Because so many of those responsible for the coercion of the populace were wrong about so many things it is hard to accept that they were mistakes. The simplest explanation consistent with the facts seems to be that the stated goal of the coercion had nothing to do with the actual goal. What was the actual goal? Was the goal to test the limits of compliance in formerly 'free' nations?

Expand full comment
Andi West's avatar

Just popping in here to point out that you should revisit the basis for your HCQ efficacy opinions. Aside from the initial 2 negative studies*, which have been retracted in the lancet** and Nature, (They were shown to be complete fabrications by a non existent trial company called Surgisphere) the rest of the large trials were more marketing based than medical***. They were designed to fail everything but the novel, patented products.

*https://www.science.org/content/article/many-scientists-citing-two-scandalous-covid-19-papers-ignore-their-retractions

**https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/04/covid-19-lancet-retracts-paper-that-halted-hydroxychloroquine-trials

***https://doyourownresearch.substack.com/p/together-trial-index-of-articles

Expand full comment
Peter Athanasius's avatar

That is what I thought too. I think HCQ effectiveness might be related to how close to onset the patient begins use it. If one uses HCQ early, the viral replication will be greatly repressed and the dreaded day 7 - day 8 O2 level plunge will not happen.

Expand full comment
Shelly's avatar

If the vaccine does not prevent Covid 19 transmission, and is now known to cause many harms and death......can you please explain your continued statements that the vaccine provides protection from serious illness in the elderly?

Expand full comment
Taz's avatar

I've been thinking exactly the same thing.

Expand full comment
ellie's avatar

For more on Dr Fauci see Robert F Kennedy Jr’s book “The Real Anthony Fauci.”

Expand full comment
luiz scofield's avatar

I still remember that year wherein Doctor Bhattacharya and Gov. DeSantis met and warned about those stupidities such as lockdowns, mask mandates, etc.

Expand full comment
Garry Blankenship's avatar

Thank you for itemizing and exposing the pandemic related Government failures. An interesting epiphany for me was to realize that not one pandemic Government mandate, announcement, policy or protocol was correct / health beneficial; not one. If that was accidental, a few efforts would have been successful / health beneficial. Accordingly, our Government's 100% pandemic failure rate was by design. That scares me.

Expand full comment
BuelahMan's Revolt's avatar

Censorship happened again at Steve Kirsch's substack.

Just yesterday, Steve Kirsch's rabid Admin had a discussion with me that culminated in my being permanently banned. I was not mean and nasty in any form. This is the same admin who banned me for a month last time for basically the same issue: Steve's hypocritical actions regarding Betting and Ron Unz making him out to be a fool.

What was my offense? I asked Steve why he would not address the issue Ron Unz raises about death numbers after Unz writes that he and Steve have had multiple conversations about the subject. Steve continually brags about betting people and doxing them and wants to make sure everyone knows that he puts his money where his mouth is, until... he is called out by another bag of money (Unz).

I wanted to know why Steve, the ultimate covid betting man, would ignore this loggerhead, would ignore the questions on his substack about it, and would ignore the email messages I wrote him directly asking.

So WaynebeGood (the rabid Admn) said that Unz wrote something about Hitler so I am an antisemite, a spammer, and banned me.

So, I am not quite sure what the scam is, but there is a scam. I suspect that it is the fact that Kirsch, Malone, Weinstein, etc, started the "covid is a virus" thing early on, perpetuating the virus theory issue, when covid is likely something other than a virus (and perhaps that viruses are not real to begin with).

Expand full comment